FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76  
77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   >>   >|  
ind. The advance of Science, however, soon demonstrated--what to the philosophical instinct needed _no_ demonstration--that the one movement is but a portion--something more, even, than a consequence--of the other. For my part, I have no patience with fantasies at once so timorous, so idle, and so awkward. They belong to the veriest _cowardice_ of thought. That Nature and the God of Nature are distinct, no thinking being can long doubt. By the former we imply merely the laws of the latter. But with the very idea of God, omnipotent, omniscient, we entertain, also, the idea of _the infallibility_ of his laws. With Him there being neither Past nor Future--with Him all being _Now_--do we not insult him in supposing his laws so contrived as not to provide for every possible contingency?--or, rather, what idea _can_ we have of _any_ possible contingency, except that it is at once a result and a manifestation of his laws? He who, divesting himself of prejudice, shall have the rare courage to think absolutely for himself, cannot fail to arrive, in the end, at the condensation of _laws_ into _Law_--cannot fail of reaching the conclusion that _each law of Nature is dependent at all points upon all other laws_, and that all are but consequences of one primary exercise of the Divine Volition. Such is the principle of the Cosmogony which, with all necessary deference, I here venture to suggest and to maintain. In this view, it will be seen that, dismissing as frivolous, and even impious, the fancy of the tangential force having been imparted to the planets immediately by "the finger of God," I consider this force as originating in the rotation of the stars:--this rotation as brought about by the in-rushing of the primary atoms, towards their respective centres of aggregation:--this in-rushing as the consequence of the law of Gravity:--this law as but the mode in which is necessarily manifested the tendency of the atoms to return into imparticularity:--this tendency to return as but the inevitable reaction of the first and most sublime of Acts--that act by which a God, self-existing and alone existing, became all things at once, through dint of his volition, while all things were thus constituted a portion of God. The radical assumptions of this Discourse suggest to me, and in fact imply, certain important _modifications_ of the Nebular Theory as given by Laplace. The efforts of the repulsive power I have considered as made for
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76  
77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Nature

 

rushing

 

rotation

 

tendency

 

return

 

things

 

existing

 

suggest

 

contingency

 
primary

portion

 
consequence
 
originating
 

philosophical

 
immediately
 

finger

 

demonstrated

 

centres

 
aggregation
 

Gravity


respective

 

brought

 

needed

 
maintain
 
venture
 

demonstration

 

instinct

 

imparted

 

tangential

 

dismissing


frivolous

 
impious
 

planets

 

Discourse

 

assumptions

 

radical

 

constituted

 

important

 
modifications
 

repulsive


considered
 
efforts
 

Laplace

 

Nebular

 

Theory

 

volition

 

inevitable

 
reaction
 

imparticularity

 
Science