xist--(that of the sphere)--that only _through_ the point in
question--the sphere's centre--they can attain their true object, Unity.
In the direction of the centre each atom perceives more atoms than in
any other direction. Each atom is impelled towards the centre because
along the straight line joining it and the centre and passing on to the
circumference beyond, there lie a greater number of atoms than along any
other straight line--a greater number of objects that seek it, the
individual atom--a greater number of tendencies to Unity--a greater number
of satisfactions for its own tendency to Unity--in a word, because in the
direction of the centre lies the utmost possibility of satisfaction,
generally, for its own individual appetite. To be brief, the
_condition_, Unity, is all that is really sought; and if the atoms
_seem_ to seek the centre of the sphere, it is only impliedly, through
implication--because such centre happens to imply, to include, or to
involve, the only essential centre, Unity. But _on account of_ this
implication or involution, there is no possibility of practically
separating the tendency to Unity in the abstract, from the tendency to
the concrete centre. Thus the tendency of the atoms to the general
centre _is_, to all practical intents and for all logical purposes, the
tendency each to each; and the tendency each to each _is_ the tendency
to the centre; and the one tendency may be assumed _as_ the other;
whatever will apply to the one must be thoroughly applicable to the
other; and, in conclusion, whatever principle will satisfactorily
explain the one, cannot be questioned as an explanation of the other.
In looking carefully around me for rational objection to what I have
advanced, I am able to discover _nothing_;--but of that class of
objections usually urged by the doubters for Doubt's sake, I very
readily perceive _three_; and proceed to dispose of them in order.
It may be said, first: "The proof that the force of irradiation (in the
case described) is directly proportional to the squares of the
distances, depends upon an unwarranted assumption--that of the number of
atoms in each stratum being the measure of the force with which they are
emitted."
I reply, not only that I am warranted in such assumption, but that I
should be utterly _un_warranted in any other. What I assume is, simply,
that an effect is the measure of its cause--that every exercise of the
Divine Will will be proportion
|