FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91  
92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   >>   >|  
have we not, an analogical right to the inference that this perceptible Universe--that this cluster of clusters--is but one of _a series_ of clusters of clusters, the rest of which are invisible through distance--through the diffusion of their light being so excessive, ere it reaches us, as not to produce upon our retinas a light-impression--or from there being no such emanation as light at all, in these unspeakably distant worlds--or, lastly, from the mere interval being so vast, that the electric tidings of their presence in Space, have not yet--through the lapsing myriads of years--been enabled to traverse that interval? Have we any right to inferences--have we any ground whatever for visions such as these? If we have a right to them in _any_ degree, we have a right to their infinite extension. The human brain has obviously a leaning to the "_Infinite_," and fondles the phantom of the idea. It seems to long with a passionate fervor for this impossible conception, with the hope of intellectually believing it when conceived. What is general among the whole race of Man, of course no individual of that race can be warranted in considering abnormal; nevertheless, there _may_ be a class of superior intelligences, to whom the human bias alluded to may wear all the character of monomania. My question, however, remains unanswered:--Have we any right to infer--let us say, rather, to imagine--an interminable succession of the "clusters of clusters," or of "Universes" more or less similar? I reply that the "right," in a case such as this, depends absolutely upon the hardihood of that imagination which ventures to claim the right. Let me declare, only, that, as an individual, I myself feel impelled to the _fancy_--without daring to call it more--that there _does_ exist a _limitless_ succession of Universes, more or less similar to that of which we have cognizance--to that of which _alone_ we shall ever have cognizance--at the very least until the return of our own particular Universe into Unity. _If_ such clusters of clusters exist, however--_and they do_--it is abundantly clear that, having had no part in our origin, they have no portion in our laws. They neither attract us, nor we them. Their material--their spirit is not ours--is not that which obtains in any part of our Universe. They could not impress our senses or our souls. Among them and us--considering all, for the moment, collectively--there are no influences in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91  
92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

clusters

 

Universe

 
interval
 

cognizance

 

individual

 

succession

 

Universes

 
similar
 

spirit

 

obtains


depends

 

absolutely

 

monomania

 

ventures

 

hardihood

 
imagination
 

question

 
moment
 

collectively

 

remains


unanswered

 

senses

 

impress

 
declare
 

interminable

 

imagine

 
influences
 

material

 
return
 

origin


abundantly
 
character
 
daring
 
impelled
 

portion

 

attract

 

limitless

 

intellectually

 

tidings

 

presence


electric

 
worlds
 

lastly

 

lapsing

 

myriads

 

ground

 

visions

 
inferences
 
traverse
 

enabled