ix, Chicchan, Muluc, Been, Eb.
Left column: Cimi, Ik, Oc, Ix, Ezanab.
Bottom line: Akbal, Manik, Chuen, Men, Cauac.
Right column (upward): Kan, Lamat, Caban, Ahau, Cib.
Now let us take the twenty days, in the order they stand in the
calendar, commencing with Kan, writing them in four columns, placing
one name in each in succession, thus:
Kan. Chicchan. Cimi. Manik.
Lamat. Muluc. Oc. Chuen.
Eb. Been. Ix. Men.
Cib. Caban. Ezanab. Cauac.
Ahau. Ymix. Ik. Akbal.
If we commence with any other day the groups will contain respectively
the same days, as, for example, if we begin with Ymix as here shown
(Table IV).
As I am inclined to believe the author of the plate adopted this order I
shall use and refer to this table in speaking of these groups.
TABLE IV.
1. 2. 3. 4.
Ymix. Ik. Akbal. Kan.
Chicchan. Cimi. Manik. Lamat.
Muluc. Oc. Chuen. Eb.
Been. Ix. Men. Cib.
Caban. Ezanab. Cauac. Ahau.
Examining the five names in the third column we find they are the same
as those in the bottom line of the quadrilateral of the plate, and also
in the same order. Those of the second column are the same as those in
the left column of the plate, though not precisely in the same order;
those in the first column the same as those in the top line of the
plate, except that in our column we have Caban in place of Eb; and those
in the fourth column the same as those in the right column of the plate,
except that in our column we have Eb instead of Caban. I am satisfied,
therefore, that the artist who made the plate has transposed the
characters Eb and Caban; that in place of Eb, the left-hand character of
the upper line, there should be Caban, and in place of Caban, the middle
character of the right column, there should be Eb, and have made this
change in my scheme (Fig. 2) and in Plate II.
This, I admit, has the appearance of making an arbitrary change to suit
a theory; but besides the strong evidence in favor of this change shown
by the arrangement of the days in four columns just given, I propose to
present other testimony.
That the characters here interpreted _Eb_ and _Caban_ are the same as
those given by Landa, and in the Manuscript Troano we have positive
evidence in the tortous[TN-6] line in the out
|