FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105   1106  
1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   1115   1116   1117   1118   1119   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125   1126   1127   1128   1129   1130   1131   >>   >|  
alike and equally guard persons invested with it against deprivation of or injury to it. Persons invested with it can not be deprived of it otherwise than by "due process of law." See The State _vs._ Staten, 6 Caldwell's Rep., p. 243. See also Rison _vs._ Farr, 25 Ark. Rep., p. 173; Winehamer _vs._ People, 13 N. Y., 378; State _vs._ Symonds, 57 Maine, 150, 511; Huber _vs._ Riley, 53 Penn., 112; Cooley's Constitutional Limitations. We conclude this list of references with Mr. Webster's celebrated definition in the Dartmouth College case (4 Wheaton, 581): By the law of the land is most clearly intended the general law; a law which hears before it condemns, which proceeds upon inquiry, and renders judgment only after trial. The meaning is, that every citizen shall hold his life, liberty, property, and immunities, under the protection of the general rules which govern society. Everything which may pass under the form of an enactment is not, therefore, to be considered the law of the land. If this were so, acts of attainder, bills of pains and penalties, acts of confiscation, acts reversing judgments, and acts directly transferring one man's estate to another, legislative judgments, decrees and forfeiture, in all possible forms, would be the law of the land. Such a strange construction would render constitutional provisions of the highest importance completely inoperative and void. It would tend directly to establish the union of all powers in the Legislature. There would be no general permanent law for courts to administer, or for men to live under. The administration of justice would be an empty form--an idle ceremony. Judges would sit to execute legislative judgments and decrees; not to declare the law, or to administer the justice of the country. That the elective franchise is a privilege of citizenship, we have the authority of Judge Washington, for he says: What are the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States? We feel no hesitation in confining these expressions to those privileges and immunities which are in their nature fundamental; which belong
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105   1106  
1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   1115   1116   1117   1118   1119   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125   1126   1127   1128   1129   1130   1131   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
immunities
 

general

 

judgments

 

legislative

 
administer
 

directly

 
decrees
 

justice

 
invested
 
privileges

transferring

 

attainder

 

constitutional

 

considered

 

provisions

 
inoperative
 
completely
 

importance

 

highest

 
render

penalties

 

forfeiture

 

reversing

 

confiscation

 

estate

 

construction

 

strange

 

courts

 
citizens
 
Washington

citizenship

 
authority
 

States

 

nature

 

fundamental

 

belong

 

expressions

 
hesitation
 

confining

 
privilege

franchise

 

permanent

 

enactment

 
Legislature
 
establish
 

powers

 

administration

 

declare

 

country

 

elective