FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125   1126   1127   1128   1129   1130   1131   1132   1133   1134   1135   1136   1137   1138   1139   1140   1141   1142   1143   1144  
1145   1146   1147   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155   1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163   1164   1165   1166   1167   1168   1169   >>   >|  
the privileges and immunities of her citizenship, which the State can not by its laws or Constitution abridge. And on page 170: If the right of suffrage is one of the necessary privileges of a citizen of the United States, then the Constitution and laws of Missouri confining it to men are in violation of the Constitution of the United States, as amended, and consequently void. The direct question is therefore presented, whether all citizens are necessarily voters. The Constitution does not define the privileges and immunities of citizens. For that definition we must look elsewhere. In this case we need not determine what they are, but only whether suffrage is necessarily one of them. It certainly is nowhere made so in express terms. The United States has no voters in the State, of its own creation. The elective officers of the United States are all elected directly or indirectly by State voters. We had supposed that if there was any question that now, at least, might be regarded as finally settled, both by the late appeal to arms, and by the Constitutional Amendments, it was that of the subordination of State to National authority, over any and all subjects in which the rights and privileges of citizens of the United States are involved. If the amendments do not cover this ground, then they are worse than useless. And yet this decision is a blow at all that constitutes us a Nation. To declare that the United States has no voters--that its officers are all elected by State voters, is to completely reverse the order of things, and subordinate the citizens of the United States to State authority. It will be observed that this decision goes far beyond the ground hitherto and ordinarily claimed by the advocates of what are called "States' Rights." It has usually been supposed that the States possessed the authority to regulate the exercise of the franchise by the Federal voter, but never before was the right itself denied as appurtenant to Federal citizenship. But now the franchise itself is declared to be non-existent--Federal officers are elected by State voters. The subject itself is wholly withdrawn from Federal supervision and control. Even the amendments
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125   1126   1127   1128   1129   1130   1131   1132   1133   1134   1135   1136   1137   1138   1139   1140   1141   1142   1143   1144  
1145   1146   1147   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155   1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163   1164   1165   1166   1167   1168   1169   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
States
 

United

 

voters

 

Constitution

 
Federal
 

citizens

 
privileges
 

authority

 
elected
 
officers

decision

 

ground

 

amendments

 

question

 

supposed

 
necessarily
 
franchise
 

suffrage

 

citizenship

 
immunities

constitutes

 

withdrawn

 

completely

 

declare

 

Nation

 

control

 

involved

 

rights

 
subjects
 
reverse

useless

 
supervision
 

things

 

regulate

 

possessed

 

Rights

 

exercise

 
declared
 

denied

 
appurtenant

called

 

existent

 

observed

 
subordinate
 
wholly
 

claimed

 

advocates

 

ordinarily

 

subject

 

hitherto