FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1131   1132   1133   1134   1135   1136   1137   1138   1139   1140   1141   1142   1143   1144   1145   1146   1147   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155  
1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163   1164   1165   1166   1167   1168   1169   1170   1171   1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178   1179   1180   >>   >|  
voters but they can't vote. Voting is a privilege and not a natural right, and must be conferred; it has clearly been conferred by the supreme law of the land, therefore women can not vote. A little voting is a good thing, but too much voting is injurious to public interests, as is instanced in our large cities. If women vote, there would be more voting than at present, consequently women are not entitled to vote. The Constitution gives women the right to vote. The organic law of the district does not. The latter, of course, is void where it conflicts with the former, therefore can not women vote. Congress has clearly recognized woman's right to the ballot, wily or nily. But the ballot must come to the woman, not she to the ballot, or else the law is violated. Congress must go further, and point out to women how the ballot must come to her, or else will she not be given Christian reception at the polls who willfully seek to vote thereat. Therefore can not women vote. _Second Judge._ Women are men, but men are not women. The former include the latter, but the latter won't be included. That is to say, the law regards men as women but not males as females. It is not every right which can be exercised, as society will not admit of it. The law, which is above society, says women shall vote, but society has not acceded, and hence this court can not interfere. Therefore, I concur that women can not vote. _Third Judge._ I do not know but that the better way would have been for Congress to have done otherwise than it did. Why it did as it did is a question. But it did. It might have done more, or less, or both. It might have done otherwise. In either case it would have done so. And then it would have been. But as it is, it is perhaps as well as if it should have been. Therefore can not women vote. _Plaintiffs' Attorneys._ But is this law? _The Three Judges._ Verily is't the law of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. This parody was written by J. W. Knowlton, son-in-law of Mr. Riddle. [167] A report of this trial will be found in the California chapter. [168] WHEREAS, Complaint has this day been made by ---- on oath before me, William C. Storrs, commissioner, charging that Susan B. Anthony, on or about the fifth day of November, 1872, at the city of Rochester, N. Y., at an election held in the eighth ward of the city of Rochester aforesaid, for a representative in the Congress of the United States, did
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1131   1132   1133   1134   1135   1136   1137   1138   1139   1140   1141   1142   1143   1144   1145   1146   1147   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155  
1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163   1164   1165   1166   1167   1168   1169   1170   1171   1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178   1179   1180   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

ballot

 

Congress

 

Therefore

 

society

 

voting

 

Rochester

 
conferred
 

Plaintiffs

 
Judges
 
Supreme

Verily

 
election
 
Attorneys
 

question

 
aforesaid
 

representative

 
States
 

United

 
eighth
 

District


parody

 
WHEREAS
 

chapter

 

California

 

Anthony

 

Complaint

 

charging

 

William

 

commissioner

 

written


Storrs

 

Knowlton

 

November

 
report
 
Riddle
 

Columbia

 

included

 

organic

 

district

 

Constitution


entitled

 

present

 
recognized
 

conflicts

 
cities
 
supreme
 

natural

 
privilege
 
voters
 

Voting