FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199  
200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   >>   >|  
of offering resistance, would have saved Germany, if she possibly could have been saved, in 1917. In the rushing torrent that whirled her away to her fall, he found no pillar to which he could cling. Latterly his sight began to fail and give way. He suffered from fatigue, and the conferences and councils lasting often for hours and hours were beyond his strength. CHAPTER IX POLAND 1 By letters patent November 5, 1916, both the Emperors declared Poland's existence as a Kingdom. When I came into office, I found the situation to be that the Poles were annoyed with my predecessor because, they declared, Germany had wanted to cede the newly created kingdom of Poland to us, and Count Burian had rejected the offer. Apparently there is some misunderstanding in this version of the case, as Burian says it is not correctly rendered. There were three reasons that made the handling of the Polish question one of the greatest difficulty. The first was the totally different views of the case held by competent individuals of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. While the Austrian Ministry was in favour of the so-called Austro-Polish solution, Count Tisza was strongly opposed to it. His standpoint was that the political structure of the Monarchy ought not to undergo any change through the annexation of Poland, and that Poland eventually might be joined to the Monarchy as an Austrian province, but never as a partner in a tripartite Monarchy. A letter that he wrote to me from Budapest on February 22, 1917, was characteristic of his train of thought. It was as follows: YOUR EXCELLENCY,--Far be it from me to raise a discussion on questions which to-day are without actual value and most probably will not assume any when peace is signed. On the other hand, I wish to avoid the danger that might arise from mistaken conclusions drawn from the fact that I accepted without protest certain statements that appeared in the correspondence of our diplomatic representatives. Guided exclusively by this consideration, I beg to draw the attention of Your Excellency to the fact that the so-called Austro-Polish solution of the Polish question has repeatedly (as in telegram Nr. 63 from Herr von Ugron) been referred to as the "tripartite solution." With reference to this appellation I am compelled to point out the fact that in the first period of the war, at a time when the Austro-Polish solution was
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199  
200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Polish

 

solution

 

Monarchy

 

Austro

 

Poland

 

Burian

 
question
 

tripartite

 

called

 

Germany


declared
 

Austrian

 

thought

 

questions

 

discussion

 

EXCELLENCY

 

annexation

 

eventually

 
joined
 

change


political

 
structure
 

undergo

 

province

 

Budapest

 
February
 

characteristic

 
letter
 

partner

 

telegram


repeatedly

 

Excellency

 

consideration

 

attention

 

period

 

compelled

 

referred

 
reference
 

appellation

 

exclusively


Guided
 
standpoint
 

signed

 
assume
 
danger
 
correspondence
 

appeared

 

diplomatic

 

representatives

 

statements