FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1617   1618   1619   1620   1621   1622   1623   1624   1625   1626   1627   1628   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635   1636   1637   1638   1639   1640   1641  
1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   1663   1664   1665   1666   >>   >|  
people of the provinces were growing very lukewarm in regard to peace, that Prince Maurice opposed it, that many persons regretted the length to which the negotiations had already gone. Difficult as it seemed to be to recede, the archdukes might be certain that a complete rupture was imminent. All these private conversations of Barneveld, who was known to be the chief of the peace party, were duly reported by Verreyken in secret notes to the archduke and to Spinola. Of course they produced their effect. It surely might have been seen that the tricks and shifts of an antiquated diplomacy were entirely out of place if any wholesome result were desired. But the habit of dissimulation was inveterate. That the man who cannot dissemble is unfit to reign, was perhaps the only one of his father's golden rules which Philip III. could thoroughly comprehend, even if it be assumed that the monarch was at all consulted in regard to this most important transaction of his life. Verreyken and the friar knew very well when they brought the document that it would be spurned by the States, and yet they were also thoroughly aware that it was the king's interest to, begin the negotiations as soon as possible. When thus privately and solemnly assured by the Advocate that they were really wasting their time by being the bearers of these royal evasions, they learned therefore nothing positively new, but were able to assure their employers that to thoroughly disgust the peace party was not precisely the mode of terminating the war. Verreyken now received public and formal notification that a new instrument must be procured from the king. In the ratification which had been sent, that monarch spoke of the archdukes as princes and sovereign proprietors of all the Netherlands. The clause by which, according to the form prescribed by the States, and already adopted by the archdukes, the United Provinces were described as free countries over which no authority was claimed had been calmly omitted, as if, by such a subterfuge, the independence of the republic could be winked out of existence. Furthermore, it was objected that the document was in Spanish, that it was upon paper instead of parchment, that it was not sealed with the great, but with the little seal, and that it was subscribed. "I the King." This signature might be very appropriate for decrees issued by a monarch to his vassals, but could not be rightly appended, it was urged, to an i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1617   1618   1619   1620   1621   1622   1623   1624   1625   1626   1627   1628   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635   1636   1637   1638   1639   1640   1641  
1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   1663   1664   1665   1666   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Verreyken

 

monarch

 

archdukes

 
States
 

negotiations

 
regard
 

document

 

ratification

 

Advocate

 
formal

public

 

received

 

princes

 

notification

 

assured

 

procured

 

solemnly

 
instrument
 
privately
 
wasting

assure

 

learned

 
employers
 

positively

 

sovereign

 

evasions

 

terminating

 
disgust
 

bearers

 

precisely


sealed

 

subscribed

 

parchment

 

objected

 

Spanish

 

rightly

 

vassals

 
appended
 

issued

 
decrees

signature

 

Furthermore

 

existence

 

United

 

adopted

 

Provinces

 

prescribed

 

Netherlands

 

clause

 

countries