FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1663   1664   1665   1666   1667   1668   1669   1670   1671   1672   1673   1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   1679   1680   1681   1682   1683   1684   1685   1686   1687  
1688   1689   1690   1691   1692   1693   1694   1695   1696   1697   1698   1699   1700   1701   1702   1703   1704   1705   1706   1707   1708   1709   1710   1711   1712   >>   >|  
States in their resolve to oppose peace or truce, except with concession of the India trade. The States preferred that the negotiations should come to nought on the religious ground rather than on account of the India trade. The provinces were nearly unanimous as to the prohibition of the Catholic worship, not from bigotry for their own or hatred of other creeds, but from larger views of what was then called tolerance, and from practical regard for the necessities of the State. To permit the old worship, not from a sense of justice but as an article of bargain with a foreign power, was not only to abase the government of the States but to convert every sincere Catholic throughout the republic into a grateful adherent of Philip and the archdukes. It was deliberately to place a lever, to be used in all future time, for the overthrow of their political structure. In this the whole population was interested, while the India navigation, although vital to the well-being of the nation, was not yet universally recognised as so supremely important, and was declared by a narrow-minded minority to concern the provinces of Holland and Zeeland alone. All were silently agreed, therefore, to defer the religious question to the last. Especially, commercial greed induced the States to keep a firm clutch on the great river on which the once splendid city of Antwerp stood. Ever since that commercial metropolis had succumbed to Farnese, the republic had maintained the lower forts, by means of which, and of Flushing at the river's mouth, Antwerp was kept in a state of suspended animation. To open the navigation of the Scheld, to permit free approach to Antwerp, would, according to the narrow notions of the Amsterdam merchants, be destructive to their own flourishing trade. In vain did Richardot, in one well-fought conference, do his best to obtain concessions on this important point. The States' commissioners were as deaf as the Spaniards had been on the India question. Richardot, no longer loud and furious, began to cry. With tears running down his cheeks, he besought the Netherlanders not to insist so strenuously upon all their points, and to remember that concessions were mutually necessary, if an amicable arrangement were to be framed. The chances for peace were promising. "Let not a blight be thrown over all our hopes," he exclaimed, "by too great pertinacity on either side. Above all, let not the States dictate terms as to a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1663   1664   1665   1666   1667   1668   1669   1670   1671   1672   1673   1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   1679   1680   1681   1682   1683   1684   1685   1686   1687  
1688   1689   1690   1691   1692   1693   1694   1695   1696   1697   1698   1699   1700   1701   1702   1703   1704   1705   1706   1707   1708   1709   1710   1711   1712   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

Antwerp

 

important

 
permit
 

navigation

 
Richardot
 

concessions

 

republic

 

question

 
narrow

commercial

 

provinces

 

Catholic

 

worship

 

religious

 

notions

 

merchants

 
Amsterdam
 
fought
 
oppose

flourishing

 

destructive

 
Scheld
 

Flushing

 

maintained

 

conference

 

metropolis

 
Farnese
 

resolve

 

suspended


animation

 

succumbed

 

approach

 

commissioners

 

promising

 

chances

 

blight

 
thrown
 

framed

 
arrangement

mutually

 

amicable

 

dictate

 

exclaimed

 

pertinacity

 

remember

 

points

 

longer

 

furious

 

Spaniards