FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635   1636   1637   1638   1639   1640   1641   1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653  
1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   1663   1664   1665   1666   1667   1668   1669   1670   1671   1672   1673   1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   >>   >|  
e would create difficulties when the whole matter should be referred to the separate provinces, and that it would, perhaps, cause the entire rejection of the ratification. The envoys, through the voice of Jeannin, remonstrated against such a course. After all, the objectionable clause, it was urged, should be considered only as a demand which the king was competent to make and it was not reasonable, they said, for the States to shut his mouth and prevent him from proposing what he thought good to propose. On the other hand, they were not obliged to acquiesce in the proposition. In truth, it would be more expedient that the States themselves should grant this grace to the Catholics, thus earning their gratitude, rather than that it should be inserted in the treaty. A day or two later there was an interview between the French envoys and Count Lewis William, for whose sage, dispassionate, and upright character they had all a great respect. It was their object--in obedience to the repeated instructions of the French king--to make use of his great influence over Prince Maurice in favour of peace. It would be better, they urged, that the stadholder should act more in harmony with the States than he had done of late, and should reflect that, the ratification being good, there was really no means of preventing a peace, except in case the King of Spain should refuse the conditions necessary for securing it. The prince would have more power by joining with the States than in opposing them. Count Lewis expressed sympathy with these views, but feared that Maurice would prefer that the ratification should not be accepted until the states of the separate provinces had been heard; feeling convinced that several of those bodies would reject that instrument on account of the clause relating to religion. Jeannin replied that such a course would introduce great discord into the provinces, to the profit of the enemy, and that the King of France himself--so far from being likely to wish the ratification rejected because of the clause--would never favour the rupture of negotiations if it came on account of religion. He had always instructed them to use their efforts to prevent any division among the States, as sure to lead to their ruin. He would certainly desire the same stipulation as the one made by the King of Spain, and would support rather than oppose the demand thus made, in order to content the Catholics. To be sure, he would
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635   1636   1637   1638   1639   1640   1641   1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653  
1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   1663   1664   1665   1666   1667   1668   1669   1670   1671   1672   1673   1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

ratification

 

provinces

 
clause
 

religion

 
account
 

prevent

 

French

 

Catholics

 
Jeannin

favour

 

separate

 

envoys

 

Maurice

 

demand

 

feeling

 

states

 
conditions
 
preventing
 
refuse

opposing

 

prince

 
convinced
 

joining

 

expressed

 

sympathy

 

prefer

 
securing
 

feared

 

accepted


division

 

efforts

 

instructed

 

oppose

 

content

 

support

 

desire

 
stipulation
 

negotiations

 
rupture

replied

 

introduce

 

discord

 

relating

 

instrument

 

bodies

 

reject

 

profit

 

rejected

 

France