FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  
with respect to inheritance, among the ancient Mexicans,"--"On the social organization and mode of government of the ancient Mexicans," _Peabody Museum Reports_, vol. ii., 1876-79, pp. 95-161, 385-448, 557-699.] [Sidenote: The Aztec confederacy.] At this point in our exposition a very concise summary of Mr. Bandelier's results will suffice to enable the reader to understand their import. What has been called the "empire of Montezuma" was in reality a confederacy of three tribes, the Aztecs, Tezcucans, and Tlacopans,[108] dwelling in three large composite pueblos situated very near together in one of the strongest defensive positions ever occupied by Indians. This Aztec confederacy extended its "sway" over a considerable portion of the Mexican peninsula, but that "sway" could not correctly be described as "empire," for it was in no sense a military occupation of the country. The confederacy did not have garrisons in subject pueblos or civil officials to administer their affairs for them. It simply sent some of its chiefs about from one pueblo to another to collect tribute. This tax consisted in great part of maize and other food, and each tributary pueblo reserved a certain portion of its tribal territory to be cultivated for the benefit of the domineering confederacy. If a pueblo proved delinquent or recalcitrant, Aztec warriors swooped down upon it in stealthy midnight assault, butchered its inhabitants and emptied its granaries, and when the paroxysm of rage had spent itself, went exulting homeward, carrying away women for concubines, men to be sacrificed, and such miscellaneous booty as could be conveyed without wagons or beasts to draw them.[109] If the sudden assault, with scaling ladders, happened to fail, the assailants were likely to be baffled, for there was no artillery, and so little food could be carried that a siege meant starvation for the besiegers. [Footnote 108: In the Iroquois confederacy the Mohawks enjoyed a certain precedence or seniority, the Onondagas had the central council-fire, and the Senecas, who had the two head war-chiefs, were much the most numerous. In the Mexican confederacy the various points of superiority seem to have been more concentrated in the Aztecs; but spoils and tribute were divided into five portions, of which Mexico and Tezcuco each took two, and Tlacopan one.]
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

confederacy

 

pueblo

 

empire

 
Aztecs
 

portion

 

pueblos

 

assault

 

chiefs

 
tribute
 

Mexican


ancient

 
Mexicans
 

sacrificed

 
miscellaneous
 

concubines

 

carrying

 

conveyed

 
sudden
 

scaling

 

beasts


happened

 
homeward
 

wagons

 

ladders

 

stealthy

 

midnight

 
swooped
 

warriors

 
domineering
 

proved


delinquent

 

recalcitrant

 

butchered

 

inhabitants

 
assailants
 
paroxysm
 
emptied
 

granaries

 

exulting

 

baffled


points

 

superiority

 
numerous
 

concentrated

 

Mexico

 

Tezcuco

 
Tlacopan
 

portions

 

spoils

 

divided