FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107  
108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   >>   >|  
however, that Canning did not receive Castlereagh's challenge till the morning of the 20th (see his letter in _Annual Register_, _loc. cit._, 505, also his detailed statement to Camden, _ibid._, 525), and therefore the duel cannot have taken place till the 21st. Lord Folkestone in a letter dated the 21st refers to the duel as having been fought at "7 o'clock this morning" (_Creevey Papers_, i., 96). CHAPTER IV. PERCEVAL AND LIVERPOOL. The administration of Perceval, covering the period from October, 1809, to May, 1812, coincided with a lull in the continental war save in the Peninsula, though it saw no pause in the progress of French annexation. Nor was it marked by many events of historical interest in domestic affairs. When parliament was opened on January 23, 1810, it was natural that attention should chiefly be devoted to the Walcheren expedition, which the opposition illogically and unscrupulously contrived to use to disparage the operations of Sir Arthur Wellesley, now Viscount Wellington, in Spain. Grenville, who argued with some reason that 40,000 British troops could have been employed to far better purpose in North Germany, would have been on stronger ground if he had complained that for want of them the British army had been unable to occupy Madrid. Castlereagh, indeed, had confessed to Wellesley that he could not spare the necessary reinforcements, after the reserves had been exhausted in Walcheren; but it is by no means certain that Wellesley could have collected provisions enough to feed a much larger force, or specie enough to pay for them. Liverpool was driven in reply to Grenville to magnify the value of the capture of Flushing, as the necessary basis of the naval armaments which Napoleon had intended to launch against England from the Scheldt. The government was also defended by the young Robert Peel, lately elected to parliament. As the calamity was irreparable, a committee of the whole house spent most of its time on a constitutional question, regarding a private memorandum placed before the king by Chatham in his own defence. So irregular a proceeding was properly condemned, and Chatham resigned the mastership of the ordnance, but the policy of the Walcheren expedition was approved by a vote of the house of commons. Mulgrave received the office Chatham had vacated, and was himself succeeded by Yorke at the admiralty. Parliament was
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107  
108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Wellesley

 

Walcheren

 
Chatham
 

letter

 

expedition

 

Castlereagh

 

parliament

 

morning

 

Grenville

 
British

complained

 
larger
 
specie
 
capture
 
magnify
 

driven

 

Liverpool

 

Germany

 

provisions

 

reinforcements


occupy

 

reserves

 

Madrid

 

stronger

 

confessed

 

Flushing

 

unable

 

collected

 
exhausted
 

ground


proceeding

 

irregular

 

properly

 

condemned

 
mastership
 
resigned
 

defence

 
memorandum
 
ordnance
 

policy


succeeded
 
admiralty
 

Parliament

 

vacated

 

office

 

approved

 

commons

 

Mulgrave

 

received

 

private