FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74  
75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   >>   >|  
are the common subjects of our thought and reasoning, and generally arise from some principle of union among our simple ideas. These complex ideas may be resolved into _relations_, _modes_, and _substances_."--(_Ibid._) In the next section, which is devoted to _Relations_, they are spoken of as qualities "by which two ideas are connected together in the imagination," or "which make objects admit of comparison," and seven kinds of relation are enumerated, namely, _resemblance_, _identity_, _space and time_, _quantity or number_, _degrees of quality_, _contrariety_, and _cause and effect_. To the reader of Hume, whose conceptions are usually so clear, definite, and consistent, it is as unsatisfactory as it is surprising to meet with so much questionable and obscure phraseology in a small space. One and the same thing, for example, resemblance, is first called a "quality of an idea," and secondly a "complex idea." Surely it cannot be both. Ideas which have the qualities of "resemblance, contiguity, and cause and effect," are said to "attract one another" (save the mark!), and so become associated; though, in a subsequent part of the _Treatise_, Hume's great effort is to prove that the relation of cause and effect is a particular case of the process of association; that is to say, is a result of the process of which it is supposed to be the cause. Moreover, since, as Hume is never weary of reminding his readers, there is nothing in ideas save copies of impressions, the qualities of resemblance, contiguity, and so on, in the idea, must have existed in the impression of which that idea is a copy; and therefore they must be either sensations or emotions--from both of which classes they are excluded. In fact, in one place, Hume himself has an insight into the real nature of relations. Speaking of equality, in the sense of a relation of quantity, he says-- "Since equality is a relation, it is not, strictly speaking, a property in the figures themselves, but arises merely from the comparison which the mind makes between them."--(I. p. 70.) That is to say, when two impressions of equal figures are present, there arises in the mind a _tertium quid_, which is the perception of equality. On his own principles, Hume should therefore have placed this "perception" among the ideas of reflection. However, as we have seen, he expressly excludes everything but the emotions and the passions from
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74  
75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

resemblance

 

relation

 

effect

 

qualities

 

equality

 
figures
 

arises

 

comparison

 

quantity

 

emotions


contiguity
 

process

 

impressions

 

quality

 

relations

 

perception

 

complex

 
passions
 

copies

 

association


impression

 

reflection

 

existed

 

reminding

 

supposed

 

Moreover

 
excludes
 
expressly
 

However

 
sensations

readers

 

result

 

excluded

 
property
 

speaking

 

strictly

 

present

 

tertium

 
classes
 

insight


nature

 

Speaking

 

principles

 

Surely

 

objects

 

imagination

 
spoken
 
connected
 

degrees

 

contrariety