FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114  
115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   >>   >|  
ve acquired a connexion in our thought, and give rise to this inference, by which they become proofs of each other's existence; a conclusion which is somewhat extraordinary, but which seems founded on sufficient evidence."--(IV. pp. 87-89.) In the fifteenth section of the third part of the _Treatise_, under the head of the _Rules by which to Judge of Causes and Effects_, Hume gives a sketch of the method of allocating effects to their causes, upon which, so far as I am aware, no improvement was made down to the time of the publication of Mill's _Logic_. Of Mill's four methods, that of _agreement_ is indicated in the following passage:-- " ... where several different objects produce the same effect, it must be by means of some quality which we discover to be common amongst them. For as like effects imply like causes, we must always ascribe the causation to the circumstance wherein we discover the resemblance."--(I. p. 229.) Next, the foundation of the _method of difference_ is stated:-- "The difference in the effects of two resembling objects must proceed from that particular in which they differ. For, as like causes always produce like effects, when in any instance we find our expectation to be disappointed, we must conclude that this irregularity proceeds from some difference in the causes."--(I. p. 230.) In the succeeding paragraph the _method of concomitant variations_ is foreshadowed. "When any object increases or diminishes with the increase or diminution of the cause, 'tis to be regarded as a compounded effect, derived from the union of the several different effects which arise from the several different parts of the cause. The absence or presence of one part of the cause is here supposed to be always attended with the absence or presence of a proportionable part of the effect. This constant conjunction sufficiently proves that the one part is the cause of the other. We must, however, beware not to draw such a conclusion from a few experiments."--(I. p. 230.) Lastly, the following rule, though awkwardly stated, contains a suggestion of the _method of residues_:-- " ... an object which exists for any time in its full perfection without any effect, is not the sole cause of that effect, but requires to be assisted by some other principle, which may forward
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114  
115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

effects

 
effect
 
method
 

difference

 
conclusion
 
absence
 
objects
 

stated

 

object

 

discover


produce
 

presence

 

increases

 

foreshadowed

 
assisted
 
requires
 

perfection

 

diminution

 

increase

 
diminishes

variations
 

concomitant

 

instance

 

forward

 
differ
 

expectation

 

disappointed

 
succeeding
 

paragraph

 
principle

proceeds
 

conclude

 

irregularity

 

exists

 

constant

 
conjunction
 

Lastly

 

proportionable

 

supposed

 
attended

sufficiently

 

proves

 

experiments

 

beware

 
residues
 

derived

 

compounded

 
regarded
 

suggestion

 

awkwardly