FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295  
296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   >>  
m another which is piracy, and the difficulty is to draw the line between what is fair and what is unfair. Lord Eldon put the question thus,--whether the second publication is a legitimate use of the other in the fair exercise of a mental operation deserving the character of an original work. Another test proposed is "whether you find on the part of the defendant an _animus furandi_--an intention to take for the purpose of saving himself labour." No one, it has been said, has a right to take, whether with or without acknowledgment, a material and substantial portion of another's work, his arguments, his illustrations, his authorities, for the purpose of making or improving a rival publication. When the materials are open to all, an author may acquire copyright in his selection or arrangement of them. Several cases have arisen on this point between the publishers of rival directories. Here it has been held that the subsequent compiler is bound to do for himself what the original compiler had done. When the materials are thus _in medio_, as the phrase is, it is considered a fair test of piracy to examine whether the mistakes of both works are the same. If they are, piracy will be inferred. Translations stand to each other in the same relation as books constructed of materials in common. The _animus furandi_, mentioned above as a test of piracy, does not imply deliberate intention to steal; it may be quite compatible with ignorance even of the copyright work. Abridgments, moreover, of original works appear to be favoured by the courts--when the act of abridgment is itself an act of the understanding, "employed in carrying a large work into a smaller compass, and rendering it less expensive." Lord Hatherley, however, in _Tinsley_ v. _Lacy_, 1863, 1 H. & M. 747, incidentally expressed his disapproval of this feeling--holding that the courts had gone far enough in this direction, and that it was difficult to acquiesce in the reason sometimes given that the compiler of an abridgment is a benefactor to mankind by assisting in the diffusion of knowledge. A mere selection or compilation, so as to bring the materials into smaller space, will not be a bona fide abridgment; "there must be real substantial condensation, and intellectual labour, and judgment bestowed thereon" (Justice Story). A publication professing to be _A Christmas Ghost Story, Reoriginated from the Original by Charles Dickens, Esq., and Analytically Condensed expre
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295  
296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   >>  



Top keywords:

materials

 

piracy

 
abridgment
 

original

 
publication
 

compiler

 

purpose

 

labour

 

smaller

 

courts


copyright

 
selection
 

substantial

 

furandi

 
animus
 
intention
 
Reoriginated
 

Abridgments

 

Hatherley

 
expensive

Tinsley
 

rendering

 

Christmas

 

Original

 
understanding
 
Analytically
 

favoured

 

Condensed

 

employed

 

carrying


compass
 

Charles

 

Dickens

 

professing

 

diffusion

 

ignorance

 

knowledge

 

assisting

 

condensation

 
benefactor

mankind

 
compilation
 
reason
 

holding

 

feeling

 
incidentally
 

expressed

 
disapproval
 

direction

 
Justice