FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138  
139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   >>   >|  
xplanation was offered-- Nevertheless the thing can be nullified-- But the nullification that we find is as much against orthodoxy in one respect as it is against our own expression that inclusion in quartz or sandstone indicates antiquity--or there would have to be a revision of prevailing dogmas upon quartz and sandstone and age indicated by them, if the opposing data should be accepted. Of course it may be contended by both the orthodox and us heretics that the opposition is only a yarn from a newspaper. By an odd combination, we find our two lost souls that have tried to emerge, chucked back to perdition by one blow: _Pop. Sci. News_, 1884-41: That, according to the _Carson Appeal_, there had been found in a mine, quartz crystals that could have had only 15 years in which to form: that, where a mill had been built, sandstone had been found, when the mill was torn down, that had hardened in 12 years: that in this sandstone was a piece of wood "with a nail in it." _Annals of Scientific Discovery_, 1853-71: That, at the meeting of the British Association, 1853, Sir David Brewster had announced that he had to bring before the meeting an object "of so incredible a nature that nothing short of the strongest evidence was necessary to render the statement at all probable." A crystal lens had been found in the treasure-house at Nineveh. In many of the temples and treasure houses of old civilizations upon this earth have been preserved things that have fallen from the sky--or meteorites. Again we have a Brahmin. This thing is buried alive in the heart of propriety: it is in the British Museum. Carpenter, in _The Microscope and Its Revelations_, gives two drawings of it. Carpenter argues that it is impossible to accept that optical lenses had ever been made by the ancients. Never occurred to him--someone a million miles or so up in the air--looking through his telescope--lens drops out. This does not appeal to Carpenter: he says that this object must have been an ornament. According to Brewster, it was not an ornament, but "a true optical lens." In that case, in ruins of an old civilization upon this earth, has been found an accursed thing that was, acceptably, not a product of any old civilization indigenous to this earth. 10 Early explorers have Florida mixed up with Newfoundland. But the confusion is worse than that still earlier. It arises from simplicity. Very early explorers thi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138  
139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

sandstone

 

quartz

 

Carpenter

 

object

 

optical

 

ornament

 
explorers
 

civilization

 

treasure

 

British


meeting
 

Brewster

 

drawings

 

argues

 

Revelations

 

Microscope

 

occurred

 

ancients

 
lenses
 

nullification


impossible

 
accept
 

houses

 

civilizations

 

preserved

 
temples
 

orthodoxy

 
Nineveh
 

things

 

fallen


propriety

 

buried

 

Brahmin

 

meteorites

 

Museum

 

xplanation

 

Florida

 
Newfoundland
 

acceptably

 

product


indigenous
 
confusion
 

simplicity

 
arises
 
earlier
 
accursed
 

telescope

 

nullified

 

appeal

 

offered