FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  
seas for itself alone. "In any event, we have now done our utmost and can quietly await what answer President Wilson and his advisers will think suitable." George Bernhard in the Vossische Zeitung remarked that the publication of the note means "liberation from many of the doubts that have excited a large part of the German people in recent weeks. The note ... means unconditional refusal to let any outsider prescribe to us how far and with what weapons we may defend ourselves against England's hunger war." What they considered the moderation of the note impressed most Berlin newspapers. Thus the Morgen Post said: "Those who had advised that we ought to humble ourselves before America will be just as disappointed as those who thought we ought to bring the fist down on the table and answer America's representations with a war threat." Count von Reventlow, radical editor of the Tageszeitung, said: "The substance of the proposals is to create a situation making it unnecessary for Americans to travel to Europe on ships under an enemy flag," and the Taegliche Rundschau said that the "answer with gratifying decisiveness, guards the conscience of the nation in the question of continuing the submarine war," but it criticises the note for possibly going too far in making concessions, which "may prove impracticable and result in weakening the submarine war." The unfavorable reception of Germany's note in the United States, as reported through English and French agencies, was read in Berlin with incredulity. The Kreuz-Zeitung, the Tageszeitung, and the Boersen Zeitung expressed the belief that British and French news agencies had purposely selected unfavorable editorial expressions from the American newspapers for the sake of the effect they would have in Great Britain and France. "Regarding the reception of the German note in America," the Kreuz-Zeitung said, "several additional reports from British sources are now at hand. Reuter's Telegram Company presents about a dozen short sentences from as many American papers. Were these really approximately a faithful picture of the thought of the American press as a unit, we should have to discard every hope of a possibility of an understanding. The conception of a great majority of the German people is that we showed in our note an earnest desire to meet, as far as possibly justified, American interests." Like the Berlin press, German-American newspapers were unanimous
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

American

 

Zeitung

 
German
 

newspapers

 

Berlin

 
America
 

answer

 

reception

 

unfavorable

 

French


agencies
 

British

 
possibly
 

submarine

 

thought

 

people

 

making

 
Tageszeitung
 

purposely

 

selected


belief

 
Boersen
 

expressed

 

expressions

 

Britain

 
France
 

Regarding

 
effect
 
editorial
 

impracticable


result
 

weakening

 

concessions

 

Germany

 

English

 

United

 
States
 

reported

 

incredulity

 

reports


possibility

 

understanding

 

conception

 
discard
 
majority
 

showed

 

unanimous

 

interests

 

justified

 

earnest