FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65  
66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   >>   >|  
ystems. In numeral scales where the formative process has been of the general nature just exhibited, irregularities of various kinds are of frequent occurrence. Hand numerals may appear, and then suddenly disappear, just where we should look for them with the greatest degree of certainty. In the Ende,[101] a dialect of the Flores Islands, 5, 6, and 7 are of hand formation, while 8 and 9 are of entirely different origin, as the scale shows. 1. sa. 2. zua. 3. telu. 4. wutu. 5. lima 6. lima sa = hand 1. 7. lima zua = hand 2. 8. rua butu = 2 x 4. 9. trasa = 10 - 1? 10. sabulu. One special point to be noticed in this scale is the irregularity that prevails between 7, 8, 9. The formation of 7 is of the most ordinary kind; 8 is 2 fours--common enough duplication; while 9 appears to be 10 - 1. All of these modes of compounding are, in their own way, regular; but the irregularity consists in using all three of them in connective numerals in the same system. But, odd as this jumble seems, it is more than matched by that found in the scale of the Karankawa Indians,[102] an extinct tribe formerly inhabiting the coast region of Texas. The first ten numerals of this singular array are: 1. natsa. 2. haikia. 3. kachayi. 4. hayo hakn = 2 x 2. 5. natsa behema = 1 father, _i.e._ of the fingers. 6. hayo haikia = 3 x 2? 7. haikia natsa = 2 + 5? 8. haikia behema = 2 fathers? 9. haikia doatn = 2d from 10? 10. doatn habe. Systems like the above, where chaos instead of order seems to be the ruling principle, are of occasional occurrence, but they are decidedly the exception. In some of the cases that have been adduced for illustration it is to be noticed that the process of combination begins with 7 instead of with 6. Among others, the scale of the Pigmies of Central Africa[103] and that of the Mosquitos[104] of Central America show this tendency. In the Pigmy scale the words for 1 and 6 are so closely akin that one cannot resist the impression that 6 was to them a new 1, and was thus named. MOSQUITO. PIGMY. 1. kumi. ujju. 2. wal. ibari. 3. niupa. ikaro. 4. wal-wal = 2-2. ikwanganya. 5. mata-sip = fingers of 1 hand. bumuti. 6. matlalkabe.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65  
66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

haikia

 
numerals
 

behema

 
fingers
 

irregularity

 

Central

 

formation

 

noticed

 

process

 

occurrence


ruling

 

fathers

 
occasional
 

principle

 

Systems

 

father

 
singular
 

region

 
inhabiting
 

matlalkabe


ikwanganya
 

kachayi

 

bumuti

 

exception

 

closely

 

resist

 

Pigmies

 

tendency

 

Mosquitos

 

Africa


impression

 

America

 

MOSQUITO

 
illustration
 
combination
 

begins

 

adduced

 
decidedly
 

regular

 

dialect


Flores

 

Islands

 

certainty

 

greatest

 

degree

 
sabulu
 

origin

 
general
 

nature

 

exhibited