FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103  
104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   >>   >|  
bauwe = 2d 5. NENGONES 5. se dono = the end (of the fingers of 1 hand). 10. rewe tubenine = 2 series (of fingers). SESAKE.[228] 5. lima = hand. 10. dua lima = 2 hands. AMBRYM.[229] 5. lim = hand. 10. ra-lim = 2 hands. PAMA.[229] 5. e-lime = hand. 10. ha-lua-lim = the 2 hands. DINKA.[230] 5. wdyets. 10. wtyer, or wtyar = 5 x 2. BARI 5. kanat 10. puoek = 5 + 5? KANURI 5. ugu. 10. megu = 2 x 5. RIO NORTE AND SAN ANTONIO.[231] 5. juyopamauj. 10. juyopamauj ajte = 5 x 2. API.[232] 5. lima. 10. lua-lima = 2 x 5. ERROMANGO 5. suku-rim. 10. nduru-lim = 2 x 5. TLINGIT, BRITISH COLUMBIA.[233] 5. kedjin (from djin = hand). 10. djinkat = both hands? Thus far the quinary formation is simple and regular; and in view of the evidence with which these and similar illustrations furnish us, it is most surprising to find an eminent authority making the unequivocal statement that the number 10 is nowhere expressed by 2 fives[234]--that all tribes which begin their count on a quinary base express 10 by a simple word. It is a fact, as will be fully illustrated in the following pages, that quinary number systems, when extended, usually merge into either the decimal or the vigesimal. The result is, of course, a compound of two, and sometimes of three, systems in one scale. A pure quinary or vigesimal number system is exceedingly rare; but quinary scales certainly do exist in which, as far as we possess the numerals, no trace of any other influence appears. It is also to be noticed that some tribes, like the Eskimos of Point Barrow, though their systems may properly be classed as mixed systems, exhibit a decided preference for 5 as a base, and in counting objects, divided into groups of 5, obtaining the sum in this way.[235] But the savage, after counting up to 10, often finds himself unconsciously impelled to depart from his strict reckoning by fives, and to assume a new basis of reference. Take, for example, the Zuni system, in which the first 2 fives are: 5. oepte = the notched off. 10. astem'thla = all the fingers. It will be noticed that the Zuni does not say "two hands," or "the fingers of both hands," but simply "all the fingers." The 5 is no longer prominent, but instead the mere notion of one entire count of the fingers h
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103  
104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

fingers

 

quinary

 

systems

 
number
 
tribes
 

juyopamauj

 

simple

 

noticed

 
counting
 

vigesimal


system
 

appears

 

compound

 

influence

 

scales

 

exceedingly

 

Eskimos

 

possess

 
Barrow
 

entire


numerals

 

notion

 

reference

 

assume

 

depart

 

strict

 

reckoning

 

simply

 

longer

 

notched


impelled

 

unconsciously

 
preference
 

decided

 

result

 

objects

 

divided

 
prominent
 
exhibit
 

properly


classed

 
groups
 

obtaining

 

savage

 
ANTONIO
 
KANURI
 

TLINGIT

 

BRITISH

 

COLUMBIA

 

ERROMANGO