FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181  
182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   >>   >|  
ity, and after three years' agitation procured a new trial before a special court of fifty masters of requests, of whom Turgot was one, on the 9th of March 1765, with the result that Calas was pronounced absolutely innocent of the crime he suffered for, and his family was awarded a compensation of 36,000 livres. The king received them at court, and all France rejoiced in their rehabilitation except their own townsfolk in Toulouse. On the 10th of April 1765--a month after the verdict--Abbe Colbert writes Hume: "The people here would surprise you with their fanaticism. In spite of all that has happened, they every man believe Calas to be guilty, and it is no use speaking to them on the subject."[153] Smith makes use of the incident to illustrate the proposition that while unmerited praise gives no satisfaction except to the frivolous, unmerited reproach inflicts the keenest suffering even on men of exceptional endurance, because the injustice destroys the sweetness of the praise, but enormously embitters the sting of the condemnation. "The unfortunate Calas," he writes--"a man of much more than ordinary constancy (broken upon the wheel and burnt at Tholouse for the supposed murder of his own son, of which he was perfectly innocent)--seemed with his last breath to deprecate not so much the cruelty of the punishment, as the disgrace which the imputation must bring upon his memory. After he had been broke, and when just going to be thrown into the fire, the monk who attended the execution exhorted him to confess the crime for which he had been condemned. 'My father,' said Calas, 'can you bring yourself to believe that I was guilty?'" FOOTNOTES: [140] _Hume Correspondence_, R.S.E. Library. [141] Ibid. [142] Lord Beauchamp was the eldest son of the English Ambassador, the Earl of Hertford, and Dr. Trail, or properly Traill, was the Ambassador's chaplain, who was made Bishop of Down and Connor soon afterwards, when Lord Hertford became Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland. [143] _Hume Correspondence_, R.S.E. Library. [144] Burton's _Letters of Eminent Persons to David Hume_, p. 37. [145] _Wealth of Nations_, Book II. chap. iii. [146] _Wealth of Nations_, Book I. chap. xi. [147] The Duke's servant. [148] _Hume Correspondence_, R.S.E. Library. [149] _Hume Correspondence_, R.S.E. Library. [150] Stephen's _Life of Horne Tooke_, i. 75. [151] Samuel Rogers told this to his friend the Rev. John Mitford. See Ad
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181  
182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Library

 

Correspondence

 

writes

 

Wealth

 

Nations

 

praise

 

guilty

 

Ambassador

 

unmerited

 

Hertford


innocent

 

Beauchamp

 

disgrace

 
English
 

eldest

 

thrown

 
attended
 
exhorted
 

father

 

condemned


confess

 

memory

 
imputation
 

execution

 

FOOTNOTES

 

Stephen

 

servant

 

Mitford

 

friend

 

Samuel


Rogers

 

Bishop

 

Connor

 

chaplain

 

properly

 

Traill

 

Lieutenant

 

Persons

 

Eminent

 

Letters


Ireland

 

Burton

 

Toulouse

 
townsfolk
 

rehabilitation

 

rejoiced

 

livres

 

received

 
France
 
verdict