FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58  
59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   >>   >|  
answered whether propounded by the counsel or not. Where the State court decided the case for reasons independent of the Federal right claimed its action is not reviewable on writ of error by the United States Supreme Court." It was held that the writs of error to this court should be dismissed, as such decisions do not involve the adjudication against the plaintiff in error of a right claimed under the Federal Constitution but deny the relief demanded on grounds wholly independent thereof." In _Wiley_ v. _Sinkler_, and _Swafford_ v. _Templeton_, the registrars were legally averred to be qualified.[66] In the Maryland case of _Pope_ v. _Williams_[67] the court further explained its position. While the State cannot restrict suffrage on account of color, the privilege is not given by the Federal Constitution, nor does it spring from citizenship of the United States. While the right to vote for members of Congress is derived exclusively from the law of the State in which they are chosen but has its foundation in the laws and Constitution of the United States, the elector must be one entitled to vote under its statute. A law, therefore, requiring a declaration of intention to become citizens before registering as voters of all persons coming from without Maryland is not a violation of the Constitution. In the case of _Guinn_ v. _United States_[68] the court held that the literacy test was legal and not subject to revision but in this clause of the constitution that part of a section providing for literacy was closely connected with the so-called grandfather clause that the United States Supreme Court declared both unconstitutional as it did in the case also of _Myers_ v. _Anderson_,[69] coming from Annapolis, Maryland, and in the case of _The United States_ v. _Mosely_, from Oklahoma.[70] The clause referred to follows: "No person shall be registered as an elector of this State or be allowed to vote in any election herein, unless he be able to read and write any section of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma; but no person who was on January 1, 1866, or at any time prior thereto, entitled to vote under any form of government, or who at that time resided in some foreign nation, and no lineal descendant of such person, shall be denied the right to register and vote because of his inability to read and write sections of such constitution. Precinct election inspectors
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58  
59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
States
 

United

 

Constitution

 

clause

 

Maryland

 

Federal

 
person
 

elector

 

constitution

 

entitled


literacy

 

coming

 

section

 

Oklahoma

 
election
 

Supreme

 

claimed

 

independent

 

closely

 

providing


connected
 

called

 

denied

 
unconstitutional
 
declared
 

register

 

grandfather

 

Precinct

 

violation

 

persons


inspectors

 

descendant

 

inability

 

revision

 

subject

 

sections

 

resided

 
allowed
 

government

 

January


thereto

 

registered

 
Annapolis
 
lineal
 

Anderson

 

Mosely

 
nation
 

foreign

 
referred
 

exclusively