FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43  
44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   >>   >|  
race in the latter State. Citizenship in this country necessarily imports at least equality of civil rights among citizens of every race in the same State." In _United States_ v. _Cruikshank_[25] it was held that rights of life and personal liberty are natural rights of man, and that "equality of the rights of citizens is a principle of republicanism." INCONSISTENCY OF THE COURT In the case of _Hall_ v. _DeCuir_[26] the court reached an important decision when an Act of Louisiana passed in 1869 to give passengers without regard to race or color equality of right in the accommodations of railroad or street cars, steamboats or other water crafts, stage coaches, omnibusses or other vehicles, was declared unconstitutional so far as it related to commerce between States.[27] Here a person of color had been discriminated against by a Mississippi River navigation company which was called to answer before a United States court for violating this act. Giving the opinion of the court, Chief Justice Waite said: "We think it may be safely said that State legislation which seeks to impose a direct burden upon inter-state commerce, or to interfere directly with its freedom does encroach upon the exclusive power of Congress. The statute now under consideration in our opinion occupies that position." "Inaction by Congress," the court held, "is equivalent to a declaration that interstate commerce shall remain free and untrammelled." This meant that the carrier was "at liberty to adopt such reasonable rules and regulations for the disposition of passengers upon his boat, while pursuing her voyage within Louisiana or without, as seemed to him best for the interest of all concerned. The statute under which this suit is brought, as construed by the State court, seeks to take away from him that power so long as he is within Louisiana, and while recognizing to the fullest extent the principle which sustains a statute unless its unconstitutionality is clearly established, we think this statute to the extent that it requires those engaged in the transportation of passengers among the several States to carry colored persons in Louisiana in the same cabin with whites is unconstitutional and void. If the public good requires such legislation it must come from Congress and not from the States." Justice Waite here expressed his fear as to the delicate ground on which he was treading in saying: "The line which separates the powers of the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43  
44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
States
 

Louisiana

 

statute

 

rights

 

equality

 

passengers

 
commerce
 

Congress

 

unconstitutional

 

Justice


requires

 

extent

 

legislation

 

opinion

 
liberty
 

United

 

citizens

 

principle

 

imports

 

voyage


pursuing
 

interest

 

necessarily

 
construed
 
brought
 

concerned

 

disposition

 

remain

 

interstate

 

declaration


position

 

Inaction

 

equivalent

 

untrammelled

 

reasonable

 

regulations

 

carrier

 
country
 

public

 

expressed


separates

 

powers

 
treading
 
delicate
 

ground

 

whites

 
unconstitutionality
 

established

 
sustains
 

recognizing