FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92  
93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   >>   >|  
icant but the difference between varieties is highly significant. Table II. Scores from five samples of black walnuts each cracked by six operators according to scoring schedule II. Operators ---------------------------------- Variety Location Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 Average Snyder Ithaca, N. Y. '46 89.2 87.3 78.9 94.4 87.5 91.5 86.5 Thomas Ithaca, N. Y. (A) '46 83.5 79.2 83.1 78.0 84.2 83.8 83.6 Thomas Ithaca, N. Y. (B) '46 73.1 67.4 73.4 74.1 69.6 83.8 73.6 Cresco Ithaca, N. Y. '46 66.0 69.2 63.1 67.2 68.5 60.2 65.7 Brown Ohio '45 62.5 51.0 65.4 60.4 48.1 64.8 58.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average 74.9 70.8 72.8 72.8 71.6 78.8 73.6 Least significant difference (5%) for variety averages 6.2 A third scoring system, involving 1) weight of kernels in grams for the first crack, plus 2) total weight of kernels, 3) all divided by the number of marketable pieces (as counted following sifting on a 1/4" round hole screen) was tried, and the resulting ranking of the varieties was very similar to that obtained with systems I and II. The results from this system appeared to be the most precise, but it was not considered as generally acceptable as system II, since the latter would be easier to record and calculate. It is the opinion of the authors that Schedule II gives a score that estimates very well the relative merit of the samples tested as to crackability, yield and marketability. It is simple to use and the only equipment required is a scale accurate to 1/10 gram. Calculations are reduced to a minimum and the characters used are not dependent on judgment of the individual making the test. It should be pointed out, however, that differences in score of less than six points are not significant on the basis of testing done to date. As more tests are made this value may be reduced. The schedule should serve as a measure to establish differences between varieties, particularly when a considerable number of tests are made. It can also be relied upon to measure differences due to the location of trees of the same variety, variation of the same variety from year to year in the same and in different locations and differences of a similar nature. In
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92  
93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Ithaca
 

differences

 

system

 
variety
 

significant

 
varieties
 

similar

 

difference

 

reduced

 

number


samples

 
kernels
 

weight

 

measure

 

scoring

 

Thomas

 

schedule

 

Average

 

Schedule

 
authors

characters

 

calculate

 
minimum
 

opinion

 

Calculations

 

accurate

 

crackability

 
relative
 

marketability

 
simple

equipment

 

required

 

tested

 

estimates

 
relied
 

considerable

 

establish

 
location
 

locations

 

nature


variation

 
record
 

pointed

 

judgment

 

individual

 

making

 

points

 

testing

 

dependent

 

results