FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66  
67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   >>   >|  
tian usages, E. Hatch, _Hibbert Lect._ (1888), pp. 119, 120; J. B. Lightfoot on Colossians ii. 14 (20); W. Schmidt, _Dogmatik_, vol. i. (1895)--many quotations _in extenso_; C. Stange, _Das Dogma und seine Beurteilung in der neueren Dogmengeschichte_ (1898)--a pamphlet protesting against what Loofs terms the "generally accepted view." Articles in the (Roman Catholic) _Kirchenlexikon_ of Wetzer and Welte, 2nd ed; (by Hergenrother and Kaulen), 1882-1901, Arts. "Dogmatik" (J. Kostlin), "Dogmengeschichte" (F. Loofs) in Herzog-Hauck's _Encykl. f. prot. Theol._ (vol. iv., 1898). Art. "Glaubensartikel" in previous ed. (Herzog-Plitt, vol. v., 1879) by C. F. Kling and L. F. Schoeberlein. For works on the history of dogma see THEOLOGY. See also DOGMATIC THEOLOGY. (R. MA.) FOOTNOTES: [1] Sextus Empiricus (c. A.D. 240) denounces all forms of dogmatism, even perhaps the scepticism of definite denial. Blaise Pascal and Immanuel Kant, among others, have Sextus's grouping in mind when they oppose themselves to "dogmatism" and "scepticism" alike. A new shade of condemnation for dogmas as things merely assumed comes to be noticeable here, especially in Kant. [2] But there is a variant reading--eleven--supported by a different arrangement. [3] Quoted by C. H. Turner in _Journal of Theol. Studies_ (Oct. 1906, and cf. Oct. 1905). G. Elmenhorst's statement, that Musanus and Didymus in an earlier age wrote treatises with the name _De ecclesiasticis dogmatibus_, seems a plain blunder, if we compare Jerome's Latin with Eusebius's Greek. [4] _"So viel uns bekannt"_--J. B. Heinrich, "Dogma," in Wetzer and Welte's (Catholic) _Kirchenlexikon_. [5] See G. Hoffmann, _Fides implicita_, vol. i. (1903), pp. 82, &c.; and cf. the 17th-century creed of Bishop Mogilas adopted by the whole Greek Church. [6] A. Schweizer's _Protestant Central Dogmas_ (1854-1856) was an historical study of Reformed, i.e. Calvinist-Zwinglian theology. [7] "Dogma," &c., in Wetzer and Welte's _Kirchenlexikon_. [8] The distinction of pure and mixed articles--those of revelation and those taught in common by revelation and natural theology--reappears in modern Roman Catholic theology as a distinction between pure and mixed _dogmas_. [9] Luther's Schmalkalden Articles and the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England should also be mentioned
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66  
67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

theology

 

Catholic

 

Wetzer

 
Kirchenlexikon
 
Articles
 

THEOLOGY

 

dogmatism

 
Herzog
 

Church

 

scepticism


distinction

 

dogmas

 

Sextus

 
revelation
 

Dogmengeschichte

 

Dogmatik

 

blunder

 
Jerome
 

ecclesiasticis

 
treatises

dogmatibus

 
compare
 

Elmenhorst

 

arrangement

 
Quoted
 

supported

 

variant

 

reading

 

eleven

 

Turner


Journal

 

Musanus

 

Didymus

 

earlier

 
statement
 

Studies

 
Reformed
 
Calvinist
 
Zwinglian
 

historical


Dogmas

 

England

 

modern

 
Luther
 

Schmalkalden

 

reappears

 

natural

 
articles
 

taught

 
common