FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80  
81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   >>   >|  
[65] Bull. 128, Wis. Expt. Stat., Sept. 1905. [66] Freudenreich, Landw. Jahr. d. Schweiz, 1896, 10; 1. [67] Weigmann, Milch Zeit., 1890, p. 881. [68] Conn, 3 Rept. Storrs Expt. Stat., 1890, p. 158. [69] Freudenreich, Fuehl. Landw. Ztg. 43: 361. [70] Harrison, Bull. 120 Ont. Agr'l. Coll., May, 1902. [71] Milch Zeit. 22:569. [72] Marshall, Bull. 146, Mich. Expt. Stat., p. 16. [73] Grotenfelt, Milch Zeit., 1889, p. 263. [74] Menge, Cent. f. Bakt., 6:596; Keferstein, Cent. f. Bakt., 21:177. [75] Heim, Arb. a. d. Kais. Gesundheitsamte, 5:578. [76] Adametz, Milch Zeit., 1890, p. 225. [77] 12 Rept. Wis. Expt. Stat., 1895, p. 148; also Bull. 67, Ibid., June, 1898. CHAPTER V. RELATION OF DISEASE-BACTERIA TO MILK. Practical experience with epidemic disease has abundantly demonstrated the fact that milk not infrequently serves as a vehicle for the dissemination of contagion. Attention has been prominently called to this relation by Ernest Hart,[78] who in 1880 compiled statistical evidence showing the numerous outbreaks of various contagious diseases that had been associated with milk infection up to that time. Since then, further compilations have been made by Freeman,[79] and also by Busey and Kober,[80] who have collected the data with reference to outbreaks from 1880 to 1899. These statistics indicate the relative importance of milk as a factor in the dissemination of disease. The danger from this source is much intensified for the reason that milk, generally speaking, is consumed in a raw state; and also because a considerable number of disease-producing bacteria are able, not merely to exist, but actually thrive and grow in milk, even though the normal milk bacteria are also present. Moreover the recognition of the presence of such pathogenic forms is complicated by the fact that often they do not alter the appearance of the milk sufficiently so that their presence can be detected by a physical examination. These facts which have been experimentally determined, coupled with the numerous clinical cases on record, make a strong case against milk serving as an agent in the dissemination of disease. ~Origin of pathogenic bacteria in milk.~ Disease-producing bacteria may be grouped with reference to their relation toward milk into two classes, depending upon the manner in which infection occurs: Class I. Disease-producing bacteria capable of being transmitted directly from a di
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80  
81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

bacteria

 

disease

 

dissemination

 
producing
 

pathogenic

 

presence

 

Disease

 

reference

 
numerous
 

outbreaks


relation

 
infection
 

Freudenreich

 
number
 

considerable

 

speaking

 

generally

 
reason
 

consumed

 

relative


collected

 
Freeman
 

statistics

 

danger

 

source

 

factor

 
importance
 

intensified

 
recognition
 

serving


Origin

 

grouped

 

clinical

 

record

 
strong
 
capable
 
transmitted
 

directly

 

occurs

 

classes


depending

 

manner

 
coupled
 

determined

 

normal

 

present

 
Moreover
 

compilations

 

thrive

 

complicated