FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  
cessarily imaginary, that one of three fluids will always spread upon the interface of the other two. Another point of importance may be easily illustrated by this theory, viz. the dependency of capillarity upon abruptness of transition. "The reason why the capillary force should disappear when the transition between two liquids is sufficiently gradual will now be evident. Suppose that the transition from 0 to [sigma] is made in two equal steps, the thickness of the intermediate layer of density 1/2[sigma] being large compared to the range of the molecular forces, but small in comparison with the radius of curvature. At each step the difference of capillary pressure is only one-quarter of that due to the sudden transition from 0 to [sigma], and thus altogether half the effect is lost by the interposition of the layer. If there were three equal steps, the effect would be reduced to one-third, and so on. When the number of steps is infinite, the capillary pressure disappears altogether." ("Laplace's Theory of Capillarity," Rayleigh, _Phil. Mag._, 1883, p. 315.) According to Laplace's hypothesis the whole energy of any number of contiguous strata of liquids is least when they are arranged in order of density, so that this is the disposition favoured by the attractive forces. The problem is to make the sum of the interfacial tensions a minimum, each tension being proportional to the square of the difference of densities of the two contiguous liquids in question. If the order of stratification differ from that of densities, we can show that each step of approximation to this order lowers the sum of tensions. To this end consider the effect of the abolition of a stratum [sigma]_(n+1), contiguous to [sigma]_n and [sigma]_(n+2). Before the change we have ([sigma]_n - [sigma](n+1))^2 + ([sigma]_(n+1) - [sigma]_(n+2))^2, and afterwards ([sigma]_n - [sigma]_(n+2))^2. The second _minus_ the first, or the increase in the sum of tensions, is thus 2([sigma]_n - [sigma]_(n+1))([sigma]_(n+1) - [sigma]_(n+2)). Hence, if [sigma]_(n+1) be intermediate in magnitude between [sigma]_n and [sigma]_(n+2), the sum of tensions is increased by the abolition of the stratum; but, if [sigma]_(n+1) be not intermediate, the sum is decreased. We see, then, that the removal of a stratum from between neighbours where it is out of order and its introduction between neighbours where it will be in order is doubly favourable to the reduction of the s
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
transition
 
tensions
 
liquids
 
capillary
 

contiguous

 

effect

 

intermediate

 

stratum

 

abolition

 

neighbours


density

 

forces

 

pressure

 

altogether

 

densities

 

difference

 

Laplace

 
number
 
introduction
 

proportional


strata

 

energy

 
reduction
 

tension

 

arranged

 

attractive

 
problem
 

favoured

 

disposition

 
favourable

doubly

 
interfacial
 

minimum

 

change

 
Before
 

decreased

 

increase

 

increased

 

magnitude

 

approximation


differ

 
question
 
stratification
 

lowers

 

removal

 

square

 

interposition

 

disappear

 

sufficiently

 
abruptness