FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308  
309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   >>   >|  
he view that he is not prevented by the _lex Pupia_ from holding a meeting of the senate, and that by the _lex Gabinia_ he is even compelled to have a meeting for the legations from the 1st of February to the 1st of March.[587] And so the elections are supposed to be put off till March. Nevertheless, on these comitial days the tribunes say that they will bring forward the case of Gabinius.[588] I collect every item of intelligence, that I may have some news to tell you: but, as you see, I am short of material. Accordingly, I return to Callisthenes and Philistus, in whom I see that you have been wallowing. Callisthenes is a commonplace and hackneyed piece of business, like a good many Greeks. The Sicilian is a first-rate writer, terse, sagacious, concise, almost a minor Thucydides;[589] but which of his two books you have--for these are two works--I don't know. That about Dionysius is my favourite. For Dionysius himself is a magnificent intriguer, and was familiarly known to Philistus. But as to your postscript--are you really going in for writing history? You have my blessing on your project: and since you furnish me with letter-carriers, you shall hear to-day's transactions on the Lupercalia (15th February). Enjoy yourself with our dear boy to your heart's content. [Footnote 583: We cannot tell the allusion, not having the letter of Quintus. But he seems to have used the expression for something incongruous either in politics, or in regard to his contemplated services with Caesar.] [Footnote 584: _I.e._, the day he had to appear for trial, usually fixed by the praetor on the tenth day from the notice of prosecution. Caelius had been acqiuitted in B.C. 56, when Cicero defended him; this second trial appears to have in some way fallen through. The praetor Domitius is said to be Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus, son of Lucius, but he was much too young to have been praetor this year. The former trial of Caelius (B.C. 56) had been before Cn. Comitius Calvinus, hence a difficulty about this passage. For the praetor Domitius of this year is not known. Domitius Calvinus was praetor B.C. 56.] [Footnote 585: The _publicani_ of Syria were enraged with Gabinius for neglecting his province while going to Egypt, thus allowing the pirates so to plunder that they could not collect enough dues to recoup them for their bargain to the state (Dio, xxxix. 59).] [Footnote 586: L. AElius Lamia, an eques, appears to have been one of the dep
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308  
309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
praetor
 

Footnote

 

Domitius

 

Calvinus

 

Callisthenes

 

Philistus

 

February

 

meeting

 

appears

 

Caelius


Dionysius
 

letter

 
Gabinius
 

collect

 

allusion

 

acqiuitted

 

expression

 

politics

 

regard

 

contemplated


Cicero

 
incongruous
 

Caesar

 

notice

 
services
 

Quintus

 

prosecution

 
plunder
 

recoup

 

pirates


allowing

 

province

 

AElius

 

bargain

 

neglecting

 

Ahenobarbus

 

Lucius

 

fallen

 

publicani

 
enraged

passage

 
difficulty
 
Comitius
 

defended

 

intelligence

 

forward

 

material

 

Accordingly

 

business

 

hackneyed