FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453  
454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   >>   >|  
of all, all-knowing and all-powerful may, although himself unmoving, move the universe.--If it finally be objected that (on the Vedanta doctrine) there is no room for a moving power as in consequence of the oneness (aduality) of Brahman no motion can take place; we reply that such objections have repeatedly been refuted by our pointing to the fact of the Lord being fictitiously connected with Maya, which consists of name and form presented by Nescience.--Hence motion can be reconciled with the doctrine of an all-knowing first cause; but not with the doctrine of a non-intelligent first cause. 3. If it be said (that the pradhana moves) like milk or water, (we reply that) there also (the motion is due to intelligence). Well, the Sa@nkhya resumes, listen then to the following instances.--As non-sentient milk flows forth from its own nature merely for the nourishment of the young animal, and as non-sentient water, from its own nature, flows along for the benefit of mankind, so the pradhana also, although non-intelligent, may be supposed to move from its own nature merely for the purpose of effecting the highest end of man. This argumentation, we reply, is unsound again; for as the adherents of both doctrines admit that motion is not observed in the case of merely non-intelligent things such as chariots, &c., we infer that water and milk also move only because they are directed by intelligent powers. Scriptural passages, moreover (such as 'He who dwells in the water and within the water, who rules the water within,' B/ri/. Up. III, 7, 4; and, 'By the command of that Akshara, O Gargi, some rivers flow to the East,' &c., B/ri/. Up. III, 8, 9), declare that everything in this world which flows is directed by the Lord. Hence the instances of milk and water as belonging themselves to that class of cases which prove our general principle[325] cannot be used to show that the latter is too wide.--Moreover, the cow, which is an intelligent being and loves her calf, makes her milk flow by her wish to do so, and the milk is in addition drawn forth by the sucking of the calf. Nor does water move either with absolute independence--for its flow depends on the declivity of the soil and similar circumstances--or independently of an intelligent principle, for we have shown that the latter is present in all cases.--If, finally, our opponent should point to Sutra II, 1, 24 as contradicting the present Sutra, we remark that there we have me
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453  
454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

intelligent

 

motion

 

nature

 
doctrine
 

pradhana

 

directed

 

principle

 

instances

 

sentient

 
present

finally

 
knowing
 
rivers
 

Akshara

 
sucking
 

declare

 

command

 

dwells

 
addition
 
remark

contradicting

 
belonging
 

similar

 

circumstances

 
declivity
 

independence

 

absolute

 
Moreover
 

depends

 

passages


general

 

independently

 

opponent

 

consists

 

connected

 

pointing

 

fictitiously

 

presented

 

Nescience

 

intelligence


reconciled

 

refuted

 
Vedanta
 

moving

 

objected

 

universe

 

powerful

 
unmoving
 

consequence

 

objections