FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133  
134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   >>   >|  
eign; whose sway is more bland and gentle than the greatest liberty under any other."[376] [Footnote 374: _L. and P._, iii., 303.] [Footnote 375: For the extraordinary freedom of speech which Henry permitted, see _L. and P._, xii., ii., 952, where Sir George Throckmorton relates how he accused Henry to his face of immoral relations with Mary Boleyn and her mother.] [Footnote 376: _Ven. Cal._, ii., 918.] CHAPTER VI. (p. 136) FROM CALAIS TO ROME. The wonderful success that had attended Wolsey's policy during his seven years' tenure of power, and the influential position to which he had raised England in the councils of Christendom, might well have disturbed the mental balance of a more modest and diffident man than the Cardinal; and it is scarcely surprising that he fancied himself, and sought to become, arbiter of the destinies of Europe. The condition of continental politics made his ambition seem less than extravagant. Power was almost monopolised by two young princes whose rivalry was keen, whose resources were not altogether unevenly matched, and whose disputes were so many and serious that war could only be averted by a pacific determination on both sides which neither possessed. Francis had claims on Naples, and his dependant, D'Albret, on Navarre. Charles had suzerain rights over Milan and a title to Burgundy, of which his great-grandfather Charles the Bold had been despoiled by Louis XI. Yet the Emperor had not the slightest intention of compromising his possession of Naples or Navarre, and Francis was quite as resolute to surrender neither Burgundy nor Milan. They both became eager competitors for the friendship of England, which, if its resources were inadequate to support the position of arbiter, was at least a most useful (p. 137) makeweight. England's choice of policy was, however, strictly limited. She could not make war upon Charles. It was not merely that Charles had a staunch ally in his aunt Catherine of Aragon, who is said to have "made such representations and shown such reasons against" the alliance with Francis "as one would not have supposed she would have dared to do, or even to imagine".[377] It was not merely that in this matter Catherine was backed by the whole council except Wolsey, and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133  
134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Charles

 
Francis
 
England
 

Footnote

 

Wolsey

 

Navarre

 

arbiter

 

Catherine

 
Burgundy
 

policy


resources

 

position

 

Naples

 

Emperor

 

intention

 

possession

 

compromising

 

slightest

 

suzerain

 

averted


dependant
 

Albret

 
claims
 

pacific

 

possessed

 

determination

 

rights

 

despoiled

 

grandfather

 

reasons


alliance

 

representations

 

Aragon

 
supposed
 

backed

 

matter

 

council

 
imagine
 

staunch

 

friendship


inadequate

 

support

 

competitors

 

surrender

 

strictly

 

limited

 

choice

 

makeweight

 

resolute

 

relations