FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43  
44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   >>   >|  
betrayed into, notwithstanding their careful avoidance of dogmatic statements.[3] [1] Diog. IX. 11, 78. [2] _Hyp._ I. 3, 4. [3] _Adv. Math._ VIII. 191. After defining the three kinds of philosophy as the Dogmatic, the Academic and the Sceptic, Sextus reminds his hearers that he does not speak dogmatically in anything that he says, but that he intends simply to present the Sceptical arguments historically, and as they appear to him. He characterizes his treatment of the subject as general rather than critical, including a statement of the character of Scepticism, its idea, its principles, its manner of reasoning, its criterion and aim, and a presentation of the Tropes, or aspects of doubt, and the Sceptical formulae and the distinction between Scepticism and the related schools of philosophy.[1] The result of all the gradual changes which the development of thought had brought about in the outward relations of the Sceptical School, was to increase the earnestness of the claim of the Sceptics to be simply followers of Pyrrho, the great founder of the movement. In discussing the names given to the Sceptics, Sextus gives precedence very decidedly to the title "Pyrrhonean," because Pyrrho appears the best representative of Scepticism, and more prominent than all who before him occupied themselves with it.[2] It was a question much discussed among philosophers in ancient times, whether Pyrrhonism should be considered a philosophical sect or not. Thus we find that Hippobotus in his work entitled [Greek: peri haireseon], written shortly before our era, does not include Pyrrhonism among the other sects.[3] Diogenes himself, after some hesitation remarking that many do not consider it a sect, finally decides to call it so.[4] [1] _Hyp._ I. 5, 6. [2] _Hyp._ I. 7. [3] Diog. _Pro._ 19. [4] Diog. _Pro._ 20. Sextus in discussing this subject calls Scepticism an [Greek: agoge], or a movement, rather than a [Greek: hairesis], saying that Scepticism is not a sect, if that word implies a systematic arrangement of dogmas, for the Sceptic has no dogmas. If, however, a sect may mean simply the following of a certain system of reasoning according to what appears to be true, then Scepticism is a sect.[1] From a quotation given later on by Sextus from Aenesidemus, we know that the latter used the term [Greek: agoge].[2] Sextus gives also the other titles, so well known as having been app
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43  
44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Scepticism

 

Sextus

 

simply

 
Sceptical
 

movement

 
Sceptics
 

Pyrrhonism

 

Pyrrho

 
reasoning
 
philosophy

subject

 

dogmas

 
appears
 
discussing
 
Sceptic
 

remarking

 

hesitation

 

Diogenes

 

Hippobotus

 
ancient

philosophical

 
considered
 

philosophers

 

shortly

 

written

 

haireseon

 
finally
 
entitled
 

discussed

 

include


quotation

 

system

 

Aenesidemus

 

titles

 

hairesis

 

question

 

implies

 
systematic
 

arrangement

 

decides


present
 

arguments

 
historically
 
intends
 
dogmatically
 

character

 

principles

 
manner
 
statement
 

including