FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125  
126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   >>   >|  
sly desired that the question of the power of the legislature over this charter should have been finally decided in the State court. An earnest hope was entertained that the judges of the court might have viewed the case in a light favorable to the rights of the trustees. That hope has failed. It is here that those rights are now to be maintained, or they are prostrated for ever. "Omnia alia perfugia bonorum, subsidia, consilia, auxilia, jura ceciderunt. Quem enim alium appellem? quem obtester? quem implorem? Nisi hoc loco, nisi apud vos, nisi per vos, judices, salutem nostram, quae spe exigua extremaque pendet, tenuerimus; nihil est praeterea quo confugere possimus." [Footnote 1: Calder et ux. v. Bull, 3 Dallas, 386.] [Footnote 2: Annual Register, 1784, p. 160; Parl. Reg. 1783; Mr. Burke's Speech on Mr. Fox's East India Bill, Burke's Works, Vol. II. pp. 414, 417, 467, 468, 486.] [Footnote 3: 1 Black. 472, 473.] [Footnote 4: 3 Burr. 1656.] [Footnote 5: King v. Pasmore, 3 Term Rep. 244.] [Footnote 6: King v. Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge, 3 Burr. 1656; 3 Term Rep. 240,--Lord Kenyon.] [Footnote 7: 3 Burr. 1661, and King v. Pasmore, _ubi supra_.] [Footnote 8: Ellis v. Marshall, 2 Mass. Rep. 277; 1 Kyd on Corporations, 65, 66.] [Footnote 9: 1 Wooddeson, 474; 1 Black. 467.] [Footnote 10: 1 Black. 471.] [Footnote 11: Ves. 537.] [Footnote 12: 9 Ves. Jun. 405.] [Footnote 13: 1 Wood. 474.] [Footnote 14: 1 Black. 471.] [Footnote 15: 2 Term Rep. 350, 351.] [Footnote 16: 1 Black. 480.] [Footnote 17: 1 Lord Raymond, 5; Comb. 265; Holt, 715; 1 Shower. 360; 4 Mod. 106; Skinn. 447.] [Footnote 18: 1 Lord Raymond, 9.] [Footnote 19: 1 Burn's Eccles. Law, 443, Appendix No. 3] [Footnote 20: 2 Forb. 205, 206.] [Footnote 21: Green v. Rutherforth, 1 Ves. 472, per Lord Hardwicke.] [Footnote 22: Attorney-General v. Foundling Hospital, 2 Ves. Jun. 47. See also 2 Kyd on Corporations, 195; Cooper's Equity Pleading, 292.] [Footnote 23: St. John's College, Cambridge, v. Todington, 1 Burr. 200.] [Footnote 24: Attorney-General v. Middleton, 2 Ves. 328.] [Footnote 25: Green v. Rutherforth, _ubi supra_; St. John's College v. Todington, _ubi supra_.] [Footnote 26: 4 Term Rep. 233.] [Footnote 27: Black., _ubi supra_.] [Footnote 28: 2 Black. Com. 37.] [Footnote 29: Sull. 41st Lect.] [Footnote 30: Phillips v. Bury, and Green v. Rutherforth, _ubi supra_. See also 2 Black. 21.] [Footnot
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125  
126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

Rutherforth

 

Attorney

 
General
 

Raymond

 

Corporations

 

Pasmore

 

Cambridge

 

Todington

 

College


rights

 
Chancellor
 

Kenyon

 
Marshall
 
Wooddeson
 

Middleton

 

Cooper

 

Equity

 

Pleading

 

Phillips


Footnot

 

Hospital

 

Foundling

 

Shower

 

Hardwicke

 
Eccles
 

Appendix

 

maintained

 

prostrated

 

failed


auxilia

 

ceciderunt

 
consilia
 

subsidia

 

perfugia

 

bonorum

 

trustees

 

charter

 

finally

 

legislature


desired
 
question
 

decided

 

viewed

 

favorable

 
judges
 

earnest

 
entertained
 
appellem
 

Speech