FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130  
131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   >>   >|  
ne homogeneous centralized tyranny takes the place of the manifold Freedom of the people. So the trial by jury faded out of all the South-Teutonic people, and even from many regions of the German and Scandinavian North. But the Anglo-Saxon, mixing his blood with Danes and Normans, his fierce kinsfolk of the same family, has kept and improved this ancient institution. When King or Parliament made wicked laws, or appointed corrupt and cruel men for judges, the People have held this old ancestral shield between the tyrant and his victim. Often cloven through or thrust aside, the Saxon Briton never abandons this. The Puritan swam the Atlantic with this on his arm--and now all the Anglo-Saxon tribe reverences this defence as the Romans their twelve AONCILIA [Transcriber's Note: for 'AONCILIA' read 'ANCILIA'; see Errata], the mythic shield which "fell from Heaven."[113] [Footnote 113: In this brief sketch I do not refer to the authorities, but see, who will, the classic passages and proof-texts in the well-known works of Grimm, Rogge, Biener, Michelsen, Moeser, Phillips, Eichhorn, Maurer, and others.] * * * * * After so much historic matter, Gentlemen, it is now easy to see what is-- THE FUNCTION OF THE JURY AT THIS TIME. Here I make three points. I. They are to decide the QUESTION OF FACT, the matter charged, and determine whether the accused did the deed alleged to be done. That is the first step--to determine the Fact. II. They are to decide the QUESTION OF LAW, the statute or custom supposed to apply to the Deed done, and determine whether there is such a statute or custom, and whether it denounces such a Deed as a Crime assigning thereto a punishment. That is the second step--to determine the Law. III. They are to decide the QUESTION OF THE APPLICATION OF THE LAW TO THE FACT, and to determine whether that special statute shall be applied to the particular person who did the deed charged against him. That is the third step--to determine the Application of the Law. Gentlemen, I shall speak a few words on each of these points, treating the matter in the most general way. By and by I shall apply these general doctrines to this special case. I. The jury is to DECIDE THE QUESTION OF FACT; to answer, Did the accused do the deed alleged, at the time and place alleged, with the alleged purpose and producing the alleged result? The answer will be controlled by the Evidence of swo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130  
131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
determine
 

alleged

 

QUESTION

 
statute
 

decide

 

matter

 

Gentlemen

 

shield

 

custom

 

charged


AONCILIA

 
accused
 

points

 
answer
 
general
 

people

 

special

 

FUNCTION

 

DECIDE

 

Maurer


Eichhorn

 

Moeser

 

Phillips

 

producing

 

purpose

 
result
 

controlled

 

historic

 

Evidence

 

APPLICATION


supposed

 

applied

 
Michelsen
 

assigning

 

denounces

 

punishment

 

treating

 

doctrines

 

thereto

 

person


Application
 
institution
 

ancient

 

Parliament

 

improved

 
kinsfolk
 

family

 
wicked
 
People
 

judges