FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150  
151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   >>   >|  
atisfied of that, they must find him guilty. No mistaken notions of Justice must induce them to refuse their verdict--for they are not to make the law, but only help execute it; and their conscience is so "fallible, especially when the rights of others are concerned, and may lead them to do great injustice," for "the annals of the world abound with enormities committed by a narrow and darkened conscience." They must not ask if it be "religious" to do so--for to use the words of the most religious of all Americans, a man of most unspotted life in public and private, "Religion has nothing to do with politics," and this is a political trial. If there be any injustice in the law and its execution the blame lies with the makers thereof not with the jurors, and they may wash their hands as clean as Pilate's from the blood of Christ. Besides, if there be injustice the President can pardon the offender, and from his well-known religious character--which rests on the unbiased testimony of his _own minister_ and the statement of several partisan newspapers published in the very heat of the election, when men, and especially politicians looking for office, never exaggerate,--he doubtless "will listen to petitions for a commutation of punishment!" But there is no injustice in it--for slavery is part of the _lex terrae_, the law of the land, protected by the Constitution itself, which is the _Lex Suprema_--the Supreme Law of the Land, and nearly eighty years old! Besides, "Slavery is not immoral," not contrary to the public policy of Massachusetts; and, moreover, the "mother" whom the criminal actually rescued, was a "foreigner" and "whatever rights she had, she had no right _here_."[120] [Footnote 120: See Hon. Judge Curtis's Speech at the Union Meeting in Faneuil Hall, November 26, 1850.] But it is not a cruel or an unchristian thing to require a negro layman to allow his mother to be kidnapped in his own house--especially if she were a born slave, and so by the very law "a chattel personal to all uses, intents, and purposes whatever," and of course wholly divested of all natural rights, even if a colored person ever had any--for an eminent American minister, of one of the most enlightened sects in Christendom, has publicly offered to send his own freeborn mother into bondage for ever! Moreover, if the jurors do not find a verdict of guilty, then they themselves are guilty of PERJURY! So the jury, without leaving their
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150  
151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
injustice
 

rights

 

guilty

 

mother

 

religious

 
Besides
 
jurors
 

minister

 
public
 

conscience


verdict

 

rescued

 
PERJURY
 

foreigner

 
Curtis
 

Speech

 
Footnote
 
bondage
 

Moreover

 

criminal


leaving

 

Supreme

 

Suprema

 

eighty

 

Massachusetts

 

policy

 

contrary

 

Slavery

 

immoral

 

Meeting


chattel

 
personal
 

enlightened

 

Constitution

 

intents

 
divested
 

natural

 
person
 

colored

 
wholly

purposes
 

American

 
eminent
 
kidnapped
 

offered

 

November

 
Faneuil
 

freeborn

 
publicly
 

require