FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  
and thus punish this man for that unlawful deed?" Then they are to ask, also, "Was the deed _naturally wrong_; done from a wrong motive, for a wrong purpose?" If not, then be the statute and the whole complex of laws what they may, it can never be right for a jury to punish a man for doing a right deed, however unlawful that deed may be. No oath can ever make it right for a man to do what is wrong, or what he thinks wrong--to punish a man for a just deed! But if the twelve men think that the Law ought not to be applied in this case--they find "not guilty," and he goes free; if otherwise, "guilty," and he is delivered over to the judges for sentence and its consequences, and the judge passes such sentence as the Law and his Discretion point out. The judge commonly, and especially in political trials, undertakes to decide the two last Questions himself, determining the Law and the Application thereof, and that by his Discretion. He wishes to leave nothing to the Discretion of the jury, who thus have only the single function of deciding the Question of Fact, which is not a Matter of Discretion--that is, of moral judgment,--but only a logical deduction from evidence, as the testimony compels. He would have no moral element enter into their verdict. The judge asks the jury to give him a deed of the ground on which he will erect such a building as suits his purpose, and then calls the whole thing the work of the jury, who only granted the land! But this assumption of the judges ultimately and exclusively to decide the question of Law and its Application, is a tyrannous usurpation. (1.) It is contrary to the fundamental Idea of the Institution of Trial by jury. (2.) It leads to monstrous tyranny by putting the Property, Liberty, and Life of every man at the mercy of the government officers, who determine the Law and its Application, leaving for the jury only the bare question of Fact, which the judge can so manage in many cases as to ruin most virtuous and deserving men. (3.) Not only in ancient times did the jury decide the three questions of Fact, of Law, and of its special Application, but in cases of great magnitude they continue to do so now, in both America and England, and sometimes in direct contradiction to the commands of the judges. * * * * * Gentlemen of the Jury, if you perform this threefold function, then you see the exceeding value of this mode of trial, 1. Fo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Discretion
 

Application

 

decide

 

judges

 

punish

 
guilty
 
sentence
 

function

 
question
 

unlawful


purpose

 

leaving

 
Property
 

putting

 
tyranny
 

determine

 
monstrous
 
officers
 

government

 

Liberty


assumption

 

ultimately

 

exclusively

 

granted

 

tyrannous

 

Institution

 

fundamental

 

contrary

 

usurpation

 

contradiction


commands

 
Gentlemen
 

direct

 

America

 

England

 
perform
 

exceeding

 
threefold
 

continue

 
virtuous

deserving
 

manage

 
ancient
 
special
 

magnitude

 

questions

 
commonly
 

passes

 
political
 

Questions