a Pair of Propositions of Relation, which contain between them a
pair of codivisional Classes, and which are proposed as Premisses: to
ascertain what Conclusion, if any, is consequent from them._
The Rules, for doing this, are as follows:--
(1) Determine the 'Universe of Discourse'.
(2) Construct a Dictionary, making m and m (or m and m') represent the
pair of codivisional Classes, and x (or x') and y (or y') the other two.
(3) Translate the proposed Premisses into abstract form.
(4) Represent them, together, on a Triliteral Diagram.
(5) Ascertain what Proposition, if any, in terms of x and y, is _also_
represented on it.
(6) Translate this into concrete form.
It is evident that, if the proposed Premisses were true, this other
Proposition would _also_ be true. Hence it is a _Conclusion_ consequent
from the proposed Premisses.
[Let us work some examples.
(1)
"No son of mine is dishonest;
People always treat an honest man with respect".
Taking "men" as Univ., we may write these as follows:--
"No sons of mine are dishonest men;
All honest men are men treated with respect".
We can now construct our Dictionary, viz. m = honest; x = sons
of mine; y = treated with respect.
(Note that the expression "x = sons of mine" is an abbreviated
form of "x = the Differentia of 'sons of mine', when regarded as
a Species of 'men'".)
The next thing is to translate the proposed Premisses into
abstract form, as follows:--
"No x are m';
All m are y".
pg061
Next, by the process described at p. 50, we represent these on a
Triliteral Diagram, thus:--
.---------------.
|(O) | (O)|
| .---|---. |
| | |(O)| |
|---|(I)|---|---|
| | |(O)| |
| .---|---. |
| | |
.---------------.
Next, by the process described at p. 53, we transfer to a
Biliteral Diagram all the information we can.
.-------.
| |(O)|
|---|---|
| | |
.-------.
The result we read as "No x are y'" or as "No y' are x,"
whichever we prefer. So we refer to our Dictionary, to see which
will look best; and we choose
"No x are y'",
which, translated into concrete form, is
"N
|