FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85  
86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   >>   >|  
a Pair of Propositions of Relation, which contain between them a pair of codivisional Classes, and which are proposed as Premisses: to ascertain what Conclusion, if any, is consequent from them._ The Rules, for doing this, are as follows:-- (1) Determine the 'Universe of Discourse'. (2) Construct a Dictionary, making m and m (or m and m') represent the pair of codivisional Classes, and x (or x') and y (or y') the other two. (3) Translate the proposed Premisses into abstract form. (4) Represent them, together, on a Triliteral Diagram. (5) Ascertain what Proposition, if any, in terms of x and y, is _also_ represented on it. (6) Translate this into concrete form. It is evident that, if the proposed Premisses were true, this other Proposition would _also_ be true. Hence it is a _Conclusion_ consequent from the proposed Premisses. [Let us work some examples. (1) "No son of mine is dishonest; People always treat an honest man with respect". Taking "men" as Univ., we may write these as follows:-- "No sons of mine are dishonest men; All honest men are men treated with respect". We can now construct our Dictionary, viz. m = honest; x = sons of mine; y = treated with respect. (Note that the expression "x = sons of mine" is an abbreviated form of "x = the Differentia of 'sons of mine', when regarded as a Species of 'men'".) The next thing is to translate the proposed Premisses into abstract form, as follows:-- "No x are m'; All m are y". pg061 Next, by the process described at p. 50, we represent these on a Triliteral Diagram, thus:-- .---------------. |(O) | (O)| | .---|---. | | | |(O)| | |---|(I)|---|---| | | |(O)| | | .---|---. | | | | .---------------. Next, by the process described at p. 53, we transfer to a Biliteral Diagram all the information we can. .-------. | |(O)| |---|---| | | | .-------. The result we read as "No x are y'" or as "No y' are x," whichever we prefer. So we refer to our Dictionary, to see which will look best; and we choose "No x are y'", which, translated into concrete form, is "N
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85  
86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Premisses

 
proposed
 

honest

 

respect

 

Dictionary

 

Diagram

 
concrete
 
Triliteral
 

Proposition


process
 

dishonest

 

treated

 

represent

 

Conclusion

 

codivisional

 

Classes

 

consequent

 

Translate


abstract
 

translate

 

Represent

 

Propositions

 

Relation

 

Species

 
expression
 

abbreviated

 
Differentia

regarded

 

translated

 
choose
 

prefer

 

whichever

 

transfer

 

Biliteral

 

result

 

information


construct
 

examples

 

represented

 

making

 

Construct

 

evident

 

Discourse

 

Universe

 
Ascertain

ascertain
 

Taking

 

People

 
Determine