FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  
brought forward--an account by Sir Arthur Mainwayring, auditor to Sir Thomas Egerton, in James I.'s reign, which is pronounced to be a forgery, and which probably is one--is an entry which mentions the performance of "Othello" in 1602. The second part of this entry is,[O]-- "Rewards; to m'r. Lyllyes man w'ch } brought y'e lotterye boxe to } x's. Harefield: p m'r. Andr. Leigh." } [Footnote O: See the fac-simile in Dr. Ingleby's _Complete View_. p. 262.] Mr. Lyllye's man got ten shillings, then, for his job,--very princely pay in those days. But Mr. Hardy[P] prints this entry,--"Rewarde to Mr. Lillye's man, which brought the lotterye box to Harefield x'li."--ten _pounds_!--the same sum that Mr. Collier made Mr. Chaloner's boy ask of Mrs. Alleyn. In other words, according to Mr. Hardy, Sir Arthur Mainwayring gave a serving-man, for carrying a box, ten pounds as coolly as he would have given as many pence! Now, Mr. Hardy, "as 10_l_. in those days would have equalled about 60_l_. of our present money," on your honor and your palaeographical reputation, does it betray "no little ignorance" to mistake, or, if you please, to misprint, 10's. for ten 10'li.? If no, so much the better for poor Mr. Collier; but if ay, is not the Department of Public Records likely to come to grief?[Q] [Footnote P: _A Review_, etc., p. 60.] [Footnote Q: We could point out numerous other similar failures and errors in the publications in which Mr. Collier is attacked; but we cannot spare time or space for these petty side-issues.] A very strong point has been made upon the alteration of "so eloquent as a _chair_" to "so eloquent as a _cheer_" in Mr. Collier's folio. It is maintained by Mr. Arthur Edmund Brae, and by Dr. Ingleby, that "cheer" as a shout of "admirative applause" did not come into use until the latter part of the last century. This is the much vaunted philologico-chronological proof that the manuscript readings in that folio are of very recent origin. Dr. Ingleby devotes twenty pages to this single topic. Never was labor more entirely wasted. For the result of it all is the establishment of these facts in regard to "cheer":--that shouts of encouragement and applause were called "cheers" as early, at least, as 1675, and that in the middle of the century 1500, if not before, "to cheer" meant to utter an audible expression of applause. The first appears from the frequent use of the noun in the Diary of Henry T
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Collier
 

applause

 

Arthur

 

brought

 

Ingleby

 
Footnote
 
century
 

pounds

 

eloquent

 

lotterye


Mainwayring

 
Harefield
 

issues

 

strong

 

expression

 

audible

 

middle

 

alteration

 

numerous

 

similar


failures
 

errors

 

appears

 
publications
 
frequent
 
attacked
 
wasted
 

regard

 

readings

 

manuscript


encouragement

 
shouts
 

recent

 

devotes

 

twenty

 
establishment
 

result

 

origin

 

chronological

 
philologico

admirative

 

maintained

 

Edmund

 
called
 

vaunted

 

cheers

 

single

 

simile

 

Complete

 
Lyllye