FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1362   1363   1364   1365   1366   1367   1368   1369   1370   1371   1372   1373   1374   1375   1376   1377   1378   1379   1380   1381   1382   1383   1384   1385   1386  
1387   1388   1389   1390   1391   1392   1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   1406   1407   1408   1409   1410   1411   >>   >|  
e,"--"_No_ better,"--"_No_ greater,"--"_No_ sooner." When _no_ is set before a noun, it is clearly an _adjective_, corresponding to the Latin _nullus_; as, "_No_ clouds, _no_ vapours intervene."--_Dyer_. Dr. Johnson, with no great accuracy, remarks, "It seems an _adjective_ in these phrases, _no_ longer, _no_ more, _no_ where; though sometimes it may be so commodiously changed to _not_, that it seems an adverb; as, 'The days are yet _no_ shorter.'"--_Quarto Dict._ And his first example of what he calls the "_adverb_ NO" is this: "'Our courteous Antony, Whom ne'er the word of _no_ woman heard speak.' SHAKSPEARE."--_Ibid._ Dr. Webster says, "When it precedes _where_, as in _no where_, it may be considered as adverbial, though originally an adjective."--_Octavo Dict._ The truth is, that _no_ is an adverb, whenever it relates to an adjective; an adjective, whenever it relates to a noun; and a noun, whenever it takes the relation of a case. Thus, in what Johnson cites from Shakspeare, it is a noun, and not an adverb; for the meaning is, that a woman never heard Antony speak the word _of no_--that is, _of negation_. And there ought to be a comma after this word, to make the text intelligible. To read it thus: "_the word of no woman_," makes _no_ an adjective. So, to say, "There are _no abler critics_ than these," is a very different thing from saying, "There are _critics no abler_ than these;" because _no_ is an adjective in the former sentence, and an adverb in the latter. _Somewhere, nowhere, anywhere, else-where_, and _everywhere_, are adverbs of place, each of which is composed of the noun _where_ and an _adjective_; and it is absurd to write a part of them as compound words, and the rest as phrases, as many authors do. OBS. 13.--In some languages, the more negatives one crowds into a sentence, the stronger is the negation; and this appears to have been formerly the case in English, or in what was anciently the language of Britain: as, "He _never_ yet _no_ vilanie _ne_ sayde in alle his lif unto _no_ manere wight."--_Chaucer_. "_Ne_ I _ne_ wol _non_ reherce, yef that I may."--_Id._ "Give _not_ me counsel; _nor_ let _no_ comforter delight mine ear."--_Shakspeare_. "She _cannot_ love, _nor_ take _no_ shape _nor_ project of affection."--_Id._ Among people of education, this manner of expression has now become wholly obsolete; though it still prevails, to some extent, in the conversation of the vulgar. It is to be observed, ho
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1362   1363   1364   1365   1366   1367   1368   1369   1370   1371   1372   1373   1374   1375   1376   1377   1378   1379   1380   1381   1382   1383   1384   1385   1386  
1387   1388   1389   1390   1391   1392   1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   1406   1407   1408   1409   1410   1411   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

adjective

 

adverb

 
negation
 

Antony

 

sentence

 

relates

 

Johnson

 

critics

 

phrases

 
Shakspeare

absurd
 

anciently

 

language

 
Britain
 
vilanie
 

stronger

 

negatives

 
languages
 

crowds

 
English

appears

 
compound
 
authors
 

counsel

 

education

 

manner

 
expression
 

people

 

project

 
affection

conversation
 

vulgar

 

observed

 

extent

 

prevails

 

wholly

 

obsolete

 

reherce

 

Chaucer

 
manere

delight
 
comforter
 

composed

 

Quarto

 

shorter

 
commodiously
 

changed

 

Webster

 

SHAKSPEARE

 

courteous