FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1385   1386   1387   1388   1389   1390   1391   1392   1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   1406   1407   1408   1409  
1410   1411   1412   1413   1414   1415   1416   1417   1418   1419   1420   1421   1422   1423   1424   1425   1426   1427   1428   1429   1430   1431   1432   1433   1434   >>   >|  
th sentence; _this sense they have not expressed_, but have severally puzzled their readers by an ungrammatical use of the word "_and_." One of the best among them says, "In _the sentence_, 'He _and_ I must go,' the word _and_ unites _two sentences_, and thus _avoids_ an unnecessary repetition; thus instead of saying, 'He must go,' 'I must go,' we connect _the words He, I_, as the same thing is affirmed of _both_, namely, _must go_."--_Hiley's Gram._, p. 53. Here is the incongruous suggestion, that _by connecting words only_, the conjunction in fact _connects sentences_; and the stranger blunder concerning _those words_, that "the same thing is affirmed of _both_, namely, [_that they_] _must go_." Whereas it is plain, that nothing is affirmed of either: for "_He and I must go_," only affirms of _him_ and _me_, that "_we must go_." And again it is plain, that _and_ here connects nothing but the two pronouns; for no one will say, that, "_He and I must go together_" is a compound sentence, capable of being resolved into two simple sentences; and if, "_He and I must go_," is compound because it is equivalent to, "He must go, and I must go;" so is, "_We must go_," for the same reason, though it has but one nominative and one verb. "_He and I_ were present," is rightly given by Hiley as an example of _two pronouns_ connected together by _and_. (See _his Gram._, p. 105.) But, of _verbs_ connected to each other, he absurdly supposes the following to be examples: "He spake, _and_ it was done."--"I know it, _and_ I can prove it."--"Do you say so, _and_ can you prove it?"--_Ib._ Here _and_ connects _sentences_, and not particular _words_. OBS. 5.--Two or three conjunctions sometimes come together; as, "What rests, _but that_ the mortal sentence pass?"--_Milton_. "_Nor yet that_ he should offer himself often."--_Heb._, ix, 25. These may be severally parsed as "connecting what precedes and what follows," and the observant reader will not fail to notice, that such combinations of connecting particles are sometimes required by the sense; but, since nothing that is needless, is really proper, conjunctions should not be unnecessarily accumulated: as, "_But_ AND _if_ that evil servant say in his heart," &c.--_Matt._, xxiv, 48. Greek, "[Greek: Ean de eipae o kakos donlos ekeinos,]" &c. Here is no _and_. "_But_ AND _if_ she depart."--_1 Cor._, vii, 11. This is almost a literal rendering of the Greek, "[Greek: Ean de kai choristhae.]"--yet e
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1385   1386   1387   1388   1389   1390   1391   1392   1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   1406   1407   1408   1409  
1410   1411   1412   1413   1414   1415   1416   1417   1418   1419   1420   1421   1422   1423   1424   1425   1426   1427   1428   1429   1430   1431   1432   1433   1434   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

sentence

 

sentences

 
connects
 

affirmed

 

connecting

 

compound

 

pronouns

 

connected

 

conjunctions

 
severally

Milton
 

parsed

 

precedes

 
mortal
 
depart
 

ekeinos

 

donlos

 
choristhae
 

rendering

 
literal

particles

 
required
 
combinations
 

reader

 

notice

 

needless

 
servant
 

accumulated

 

proper

 
unnecessarily

observant
 

incongruous

 

suggestion

 

conjunction

 

connect

 

stranger

 

affirms

 

Whereas

 

blunder

 
repetition

unnecessary
 
readers
 

ungrammatical

 

puzzled

 

expressed

 
unites
 

avoids

 

absurdly

 

supposes

 

examples