FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758  
759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   >>   >|  
will have been. POT. Thou may, can, _or_ must be; Thou might, could, would, _or_ should be; Thou may, can, _or_ must have been; Thou might, could, would, _or_ should have been. SUBJ. If thou be, If thou were. IMP. Be [thou,] _or_ Do thou be. OBSERVATIONS. OBS. 1.--It appears that _be_, as well as _am_, was formerly used for the indicative present: as, "I be, Thou beest, He be; We be, Ye be, They be." See _Brightland's Gram._, p. 114. Dr. Lowth, whose Grammar is still preferred at Harvard University, gives both forms, thus: "I am, Thou art, He is; We are, Ye are, They are. Or, I be, Thou beest, He _is_; We be, Ye be, They be." To the third person singular, he subjoins the following example and remark: "'I think it _be_ thine indeed, for thou liest in it.' Shak. Hamlet. _Be_, in the singular number of this time and mode, especially in the third person, is obsolete; and _is become_ somewhat antiquated _in the plural_."--_Lowth's Gram._, p. 36. Dr. Johnson gives this tense thus: "_Sing_. I am; thou art; he is; _Plur_. We are, _or_ be; ye are, _or_ be; they are, _or_ be." And adds, "The plural _be_ is now little in use."--_Gram. in Johnson's Dict._, p. 8. The Bible commonly has _am, art, is_, and _are_, but not always; the indicative _be_ occurs in some places: as, "We _be_ twelve brethren."--_Gen._, xlii, 32. "What _be_ these two olive branches?"--_Zech._, iv, 12. Some traces of this usage still occur in poetry: as, "There _be_ more things to greet the heart and eyes In Arno's dome of Art's most princely shrine, Where Sculpture with her rainbow sister vies; There _be_ more marvels yet--but not for mine." --_Byron's Childe Harold_, Canto iv, st. 61. OBS. 2.--Respecting the verb _wert_, it is not easy to determine whether it is most properly of the indicative mood only, or of the subjunctive mood only, or of both, or of neither. The _regular_ and _analogical_ form for the indicative, is "Thou _wast_;" and for the subjunctive, "If thou _were_." Brightland exhibits, "I _was_ or _were_, Thou _wast_ or _wert_, He _was_ or _were_," without distinction of mood, for the three persons singular; and, for the plural, _were_ only. Dr. Johnson gives us, for the indicative, "Thou wast, _or_ wert;" with the remark, "_Wert_ is properly of the _conjunctive_ mood, and ought not to be used in the indicative."--_Johnson's Gram._, p. 8. In his conjunctive (or subjunctive) mood, he has, "Thou _beest_," and "Thou
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758  
759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

indicative

 

Johnson

 

plural

 

singular

 

subjunctive

 

person

 

remark

 

conjunctive

 

Brightland


properly
 

Sculpture

 
princely
 
shrine
 

branches

 
traces
 

things

 

poetry

 

analogical


exhibits
 

regular

 

determine

 

distinction

 

persons

 
marvels
 
rainbow
 

sister

 

Childe


Respecting

 

Harold

 

University

 

Harvard

 
preferred
 

subjoins

 

Grammar

 

OBSERVATIONS

 

appears


present

 

Hamlet

 
number
 

commonly

 
occurs
 
places
 

twelve

 

brethren

 

obsolete


antiquated