FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772  
773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   >>   >|  
s_ and _retained_ ACTION, they express _present_ time; and must be treated accordingly."--P. 103. This seems to intimate that even, "_I am smitten_," and its likes, as they stand, may have some good claim to be of the present tense; which suggestion is contrary to several others made by the author. To expound this, or any other passive term, _passively_, never enters his mind: with him, as with sundry others, "ACTION," "_finished_ ACTION," or "_progressive_ ACTION," is all any _passive_ verb or participle ever means! No marvel, that awkward perversions of the forms of utterance and the principles of grammar should follow such interpretation. In Wright's syntax a very queer distinction is apparently made between a passive verb, and the participle chiefly constituting it; and here, too, through a fancied ellipsis of "_being_" before the latter, most, if not all, of his other positions concerning passives, are again disastrously overthrown by something worse--a word "_imperceptibly understood_." "'_I am smitten_;' '_I was smitten_;' &c., are," he says, "the _universally acknowledged forms_ of the VERBS in these tenses, in the passive voice:--not of the _PARTICIPLE_. In all verbal constructions of the character of which we have hitherto treated, (see page 103) _and, where_ the ACTIONS described are _continuous_ in their _operations_,--the participle BEING is _imperceptibly omitted, by ellipsis_."--P. 144. OBS. 15.--Dr. Bullions has stated, that, "The present participle active, and the present participle passive, are _not counterparts_ to each other in signification; [,] the one signifying the present doing, and the other the present suffering of an action, [;] for the latter _always intimates the present being of an_ ACT, _not in progress, but completed_."--_Prin. of Eng. Gram._, p. 58. In this, he errs no less grossly than in his idea of the "_action_ or the suffering" expressed by "a _perfect_ participle," as cited in OBS. 5th above; namely, that it must have _ceased_. Worse interpretation, or balder absurdity, is scarcely to be met with; and yet the reverend Doctor, great linguist as he should be, was here only trying to think and tell the common import of a very common sort of _English_ participles; such as, "_being loved_" and "_being seen_." In grammar, "_an act_," that has "_present being_," can be nothing else than an act now doing, or "_in progress_;" and if, "_the present being of an_ ACT _not in progress_," were
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772  
773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

present

 

participle

 

passive

 

ACTION

 

progress

 

smitten

 

imperceptibly

 

grammar

 

ellipsis

 
interpretation

action

 
suffering
 
common
 

treated

 
counterparts
 

continuous

 

active

 

ACTIONS

 
intimates
 

signification


Bullions

 

stated

 

operations

 
omitted
 
signifying
 

grossly

 

linguist

 

Doctor

 

reverend

 

participles


English

 
import
 

scarcely

 

absurdity

 

completed

 

expressed

 

ceased

 

balder

 
perfect
 

passives


enters
 
passively
 

expound

 

sundry

 

finished

 

awkward

 

perversions

 
utterance
 

marvel

 
progressive