FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  
course, that's Rosebery? SHOPMAN (_nervously_): Y-e-s. (_Brightly changing subject_.) What do you think of Mr. Sargent's? D. C. (_now worked up_). Oh! that's very good. Yes; that's the best of all. I see it's sold. I should have bought that one if it hadn't been sold. I wish Max would do a caricature of (_describes a possible caricature_). Tell him I suggested it; he knows me quite well (_glancing round_). He really is tremendous. Are they going to be published? SHOPMAN. Yes; by Methuen & Co. (_Hastily going over to new-comer_.) Yes, madam, that is Mr. Arthur Balfour; it's considered the _best_ caricature in the exhibition--the likeness is so particularly striking; and as a pure piece of draughtsmanship it is certainly the finest drawing in the room. No; that's not so good of Lord Althorp, though it _was_ the first to sell. (_Turning to another client_.) Yes, sir; he is Mr. Beerbohm Tree's half-brother. (1907.) _To_ MRS. BEERBOHM. THE ETHICS OF REVIEWING. The 'Acropolis,' a review of literature, science, art, politics, society, and the drama, is, as every one knows, our leading literary weekly. Its original promoters decided on its rather eccentric title with a symbolism now outmoded. The 'Acropolis' was to be impregnable to outside contributors, and the editor was always to be invisible. All the vile and secret arts of reclame and puffery were to find no place in its immaculate pages. One afternoon some time ago a number of gentlemen, more or less responsible for the production of the 'Acropolis,' were seated round the fire in the smoking-room of a certain club. For the last hour they had been discussing with some warmth the merits of signed or unsigned articles and the reviewing of books. A tall, good-looking man, who pretended to be unpopular, was advocating the anonymous. 'There is something so cowardly about a signed article,' he was saying. 'It is nearly as bad as insulting a man in public, when there is no redress except to call for the police. And that is ridiculous. If I am slated by an anonymous writer, it is always in my power to pay no attention, whereas if the slate is signed, I am obliged to take notice of some kind. I must either deny the statements, often at a great sacrifice of truth, or if I assault the writer there is always the risk of his being physically stronger than I am. No; anonymous attack is the only weapon for gentlemen.' 'To leave for a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Acropolis

 

anonymous

 
signed
 

caricature

 

writer

 

SHOPMAN

 

gentlemen

 

reclame

 

unsigned

 
merits

discussing

 
articles
 
warmth
 
invisible
 
secret
 

reviewing

 

seated

 

afternoon

 

production

 

number


responsible

 

smoking

 

immaculate

 

puffery

 

insulting

 

statements

 

obliged

 

notice

 
sacrifice
 

attack


weapon

 

stronger

 

physically

 

assault

 
attention
 
article
 

cowardly

 
unpopular
 
pretended
 

advocating


editor
 
public
 

slated

 

ridiculous

 

redress

 

police

 

society

 

glancing

 

suggested

 

describes