FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168  
169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   >>   >|  
and is the only line to the west of the meridian of the St. Croix which can possibly do so. The choice of a line different from that presented to the choice of the King of the Netherlands is no new instance of the uncertainty which has affected all the forms in which Great Britain has urged her claim. In fact, nothing shows more conclusively the weakness of the ground on which the British claim rests than the continual changes which it has been necessary to make in order to found any feasible argument upon it.[60] In the discussion of 1798 it was maintained on the part of Great Britain that the meridian line must cross the St. John River; in the argument before the commissioners under the fifth article of the treaty of Ghent it was denied that it ever could have been the intention of the framers of the treaty of 1783 that it should. Yet the mouthpiece by which both arguments were delivered was one and the same person. The same agent chose as the termination of what he attempted to represent as a continuous range of hills an isolated mountain, Mars Hill; and the commissioners whose report is under consideration place a range of abraded highlands, "the maximum axis of elevation," in a region over which British engineers have proposed to carry a railroad as the most level and lowest line which exists between St. Andrews and Quebec.[61] [Footnote 60: See Note XII, p. 149.] [Footnote 61: Prospectus of St. Andrews and Quebec Railroad, 1836; and Survey of Captain Yule, 1835.] On the other hand, the American claim, based on the only practicable interpretation of the treaty of 1783, has been consistent throughout: "Let the meridian line be extended until it meets the southern boundary of the Province of Quebec, as defined by the proclamation of 1763 and the act of Parliament of 1774." No argument can be drawn against the American claim from the secret instructions of Congress dated August, 1779. All that is shown by these instructions is the willingness to accept a more convenient boundary--one defined by a great natural feature, and which would have rendered the difficult operation of tracing the line of highlands and that of determining the meridian of the St. Croix by astronomic methods unnecessary. The words of the instructions are: "And east by a line to be drawn along the middle of the St. John from its source to its mouth in the Bay of Fundy, _or_ by a line to be settled and adjusted between that part of th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168  
169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

meridian

 

treaty

 

instructions

 
Quebec
 

argument

 

British

 

commissioners

 

boundary

 
American
 

highlands


Footnote

 
Andrews
 

defined

 
choice
 

Britain

 

practicable

 

source

 
extended
 

consistent

 

interpretation


settled

 
adjusted
 

lowest

 

exists

 

Survey

 

Captain

 
Railroad
 

Prospectus

 
middle
 

determining


August

 

willingness

 

accept

 

operation

 
difficult
 
feature
 
natural
 

convenient

 

tracing

 

astronomic


Congress

 

proclamation

 
Province
 

southern

 

rendered

 

Parliament

 
unnecessary
 

secret

 

methods

 

continuous