FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189  
190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   >>   >|  
the due north line from the source of the St. Croix must of necessity cross the St. John. It has since been maintained on the part of Great Britain: First. That the limits of Nova Scotia never did extend to the St. Lawrence. Second. That the northwest angle of Nova Scotia was unknown in 1783. Third. That Acadie extended south to the forty-sixth degree of north latitude, and was not the same with Nova Scotia. Fourth. That the sea and the Atlantic Ocean were different things. Fifth. That the claims and rights of Massachusetts did not extend to the western bounds of the grant to Sir William Alexander. Sixth. That this being the case the cession of territory not included within her limits is void. Seventh. That it could never have been intended that the meridian line should cross the St. John. _Note XIII_. It has been pretended that the grant of the fief of Madawaska in 1683 can be urged as a bar to the claim of Massachusetts. That fief, indeed, was among the early grants of the French governors of Canada, but it is not included in the claim which the French themselves set up. It was therefore covered by the Massachusetts charter, because the grant had never been acted upon. Even up to the present day this fief can hardly be said to be settled or occupied except by the retainers of the garrison of Fort Ingall, and from all the evidence which could be found on the spot it appeared that no settlement had ever been made upon it until the establishment of a posthouse some time between the date of the treaties of 1783 and 1794. It therefore was not at the time the charter of Massachusetts was granted (1691) "actually possessed or inhabited by any other Christian prince or state." An argument has also been attempted to be drawn from the limits given on Greenleaf's map to a purchase made from the State of Massachusetts by Watkins and Flint. This purchase is, however, by the patent extended to the highlands, and the surveyors who laid it out crossed the Walloostook in search of them. Here they met, at a short distance from that stream, with waters running to the north, which they conceived to be waters of the St. Lawrence, and they terminated their survey. The lines traced on Greenleaf's map are therefore incorrect, either as compared with the grant or the actual survey, and although from a want of knowledge of the country the surveyors stopped at waters running into Lake Temiscouata instead of the St. L
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189  
190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Massachusetts

 

Scotia

 

waters

 

limits

 

running

 

Greenleaf

 

purchase

 

surveyors

 
included
 

French


charter
 

extend

 

Lawrence

 
extended
 

survey

 
argument
 
settlement
 

appeared

 

establishment

 

posthouse


possessed

 

inhabited

 
granted
 

Christian

 
treaties
 

prince

 

incorrect

 

compared

 
traced
 

conceived


terminated

 

actual

 

Temiscouata

 

stopped

 

knowledge

 

country

 

stream

 

distance

 
patent
 
Watkins

attempted

 

highlands

 

search

 

Walloostook

 

evidence

 

crossed

 

things

 

Atlantic

 

latitude

 

Fourth