FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147  
148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   >>   >|  
ous have been the materials employed for the purpose that the great and only important question, although never lost sight of by the writers themselves, has to the eye of the casual observer been completely hidden. In the report under consideration this distinction between treaties of binding force and documents intended for mere illustration has not been regarded, and the vague as well as obviously inaccurate delineations of a French or a Venetian map maker are gravely held forth as of equal value for a basis of argument as the solemn and ratified acts of the two nations. In pursuance of this desire of illustration, every known document which could in any form support either claim has been advanced and set forth in the statements laid before His Majesty the King of the Netherlands when acting as umpire under the fifth article of the treaty of Ghent. If not yet given entire to the public,[39] they are in the possession of both Governments in a printed form, together with the opinion of the arbiter in respect to them; and although it is necessary that the arguments then adduced in favor of the American claim should be in part repeated, and although new illustrations of the correctness of that argument have since been brought to light, the present document will be confined as closely as possible to the provisions of the treaty itself, and will adduce no more of illustration than is barely sufficient to render the terms of that treaty certain and definite. [Footnote 39: A considerable part of the papers, together with the argument, has been published by Mr. Gallatin in his Right of the United States to the Northeastern Boundary. New York, 1840. 8 vo. pp. 180.] The boundaries of the United States are described in the treaty of 1783 in the following words:[40] [Footnote 40: The words here appearing in italics are not italicized in the original treaty.] "And that _all disputes which might arise in future on the subject of the boundaries of the said United States may be prevented_ it is hereby agreed and declared that the following are and shall be their boundaries, viz: _From the northwest angle of Nova Scotia_, viz, _that angle which is formed by a line drawn due north from the source of St. Croix River to the highlands; along the said highlands which divide those rivers that empty themselves into the river St. Lawrence from those which fall into the Atlantic Ocean_ to the _northwesternmost_ head of Connecticut Riv
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147  
148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

treaty

 

illustration

 

States

 
boundaries
 

United

 

argument

 

document

 
Footnote
 

highlands

 

Connecticut


Gallatin

 

Boundary

 
Northeastern
 

provisions

 

adduce

 
present
 

confined

 

closely

 

definite

 

considerable


papers
 

barely

 
sufficient
 

render

 

published

 

Atlantic

 

northwest

 

Scotia

 
agreed
 

declared


Lawrence
 

formed

 

divide

 

source

 
prevented
 

appearing

 

italics

 

italicized

 
original
 

rivers


subject

 

future

 

disputes

 

northwesternmost

 
respect
 

delineations

 

inaccurate

 

French

 
Venetian
 

intended