FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119  
120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   >>   >|  
t on Canadian Archives, 1896, Lower Canada, pp. 132, 138-140. Barclay in his Defence before the Court Martial mentions the designs on Erie. [81] Harm Jan Huidekoper, by Nina Moore Tiffany and Francis Tiffany. 1904. p. 187. Mr. Huidekoper speaks admiringly of the unfaltering composure and cheerfulness which under these circumstances accompanied Perry's energy. [82] See ante, p. 41. [83] Report on Canadian Archives, 1896. Lower Canada, p. 133. [84] This statement appeared in the course of a _summary_ of the evidence before the British Court, given by the Naval Chronicle, vol. xxxii. pp. 241-242. The only support to it in the evidence, as recorded, is Barclay's official letter, which he appears to have confirmed under oath, that the "Niagara" kept out of carronade range, and "was perfectly fresh at 2.30," when Perry went on board her. The first lieutenant of the "Queen Charlotte," who remained in command, the captain being killed, corroborated Barclay as to her distance. [85] In the finding--or verdict--of the British Court, as in the evidence, there is no expression of a charge that the "Niagara" was making away. The finding restricted itself to the matter before the Court, namely, Barclay's official conduct. [86] There was a question whether the "Hunter" was ahead or astern of the "Queen Charlotte." In the author's opinion the balance of evidence is as stated in the text. Perry rearranged his line with reference to the British, upon seeing their array. Had the "Charlotte" been next the "Detroit," as James puts her, it seems probable he would have placed the "Niagara" next the "Lawrence." [87] Cooper, Battle of Lake Erie, p. 63. [88] See Mackenzie's Life of Perry, 5th edition, vol. ii. pp. 251-252. Perry's charges against Elliott, dated Aug. 8, 1818, are there given in full. [89] See Mackenzie's Life of Perry, 5th edition, vol. ii. pp. 251-252. [90] Cooper's Battle of Lake Erie, p. 63. [91] Barclay's Report, Naval Chronicle, vol. xxxi. p. 251. [92] The range of a 32 pdr. carronade, with which the "Niagara" was armed, throwing one solid shot, with 1/4 degree elevation,--substantially point-blank,--was 260 yards; at 5 degrees, 1260 yards. The difference, 1000 yards, is just half a sea mile. A British professional writer of that day, criticising their commander's choice of position at Lake Champlain, says: "At 1000 or 1100 yards the elevation necessary to be given a carronade would have been so gre
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119  
120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Barclay
 

evidence

 

Niagara

 
British
 

Charlotte

 

carronade

 

Battle

 

Canada

 
Mackenzie
 
Chronicle

edition

 

Archives

 

Canadian

 

Cooper

 

official

 

elevation

 

Tiffany

 

Huidekoper

 

Report

 
finding

Elliott
 

probable

 
charges
 

reference

 

rearranged

 

Detroit

 

Lawrence

 
difference
 
degrees
 

choice


position
 

Champlain

 

commander

 

criticising

 

professional

 

writer

 

throwing

 

degree

 

substantially

 

stated


corroborated

 

circumstances

 

accompanied

 
energy
 

statement

 

support

 

recorded

 

appeared

 

summary

 

cheerfulness