FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272  
273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   >>   >|  
t and second part of _Arviragus and Philicia_ were acted at the Cockpit before the King and Queen, the Prince, and Prince Elector, the 18 and 19 April, 1636, being Monday and Tuesday in Easter week.[674] [Footnote 669: Lord Chamberlain's Office-Book, C.C. Stopes, "Shakespeare's Fellows and Followers," Shakespeare _Jahrbuch_, XLVI, 96.] [Footnote 670: Herbert MS., Malone, _Variorum_, III, 237.] [Footnote 671: Herbert MS., Malone, _Variorum_, III, 237.] [Footnote 672: Lord Chamberlain's Office-Book, Chalmers's _Apology_, p. 508.] [Footnote 673: _Ibid._, p. 509.] [Footnote 674: The Herbert MS., Malone, _Variorum_, III, 238.] Other similar allusions to performance in the Cockpit might be cited from the Court records. One more will suffice--the most interesting of all, since it shows how frequently the little theatre was employed for the entertainment of the royal family. It is a bill presented by the Blackfriars Company, the King's Men, for Court performances during the year 1637. This bill was discovered and reproduced in facsimile by George R. Wright, F.S.A., in _The Journal of the British Archaeological Association_ for 1860; but it was wholly misunderstood by its discoverer, who regarded it as drawn up by the company of players that "performed at the Cockpit in Drury Lane." He was indeed somewhat puzzled by the reference to the Blackfriars Playhouse, but met the difficulty by saying: "There can be little doubt that the last-named theatre was lent for the occasion to the Cockpit Company," although he suggests no reason for this strange borrowing of a theatre by a troupe that possessed a house of its own, and much nearer the Court, too. It did not even occur to him, it seems, to inquire how the Cockpit Company secured the plays which we know belonged to Shakespeare's old company. Because of these obvious difficulties scholars have looked upon the document with suspicion, and apparently have treated it as a forgery.[675] But that it is genuine is indicated by the history of "The Cockpit-in-Court" as sketched above, and is proved beyond any question by the fact that the Office-Book of the Lord Chamberlain shows that the bill was paid: 12th March 1638 {9}.--Forasmuch as His Majesty's Servants, the company at the Blackfriars, have by special command, at divers times within the space of this present year 1638, acted 24 plays before His Majesty, six whereof have been pe
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272  
273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Cockpit

 

Footnote

 
Shakespeare
 

Office

 
company
 

Chamberlain

 
theatre
 

Malone

 
Blackfriars
 

Company


Herbert

 
Variorum
 

Prince

 
Majesty
 
troupe
 

strange

 

borrowing

 

possessed

 

nearer

 

present


reference
 

Playhouse

 
difficulty
 
whereof
 

suggests

 
occasion
 

reason

 

inquire

 

treated

 
forgery

apparently
 

suspicion

 
document
 

genuine

 

proved

 
question
 

sketched

 

history

 

puzzled

 

special


Servants

 

command

 

secured

 

divers

 

Forasmuch

 
obvious
 

difficulties

 

scholars

 

looked

 
Because