er comment of this impartial
father.[24] Like many a phrase, possibly the fruit of later harvests,
this is an excellent epitome of the situation.
[Footnote 1: I.,ch. xxxi.]
[Footnote 2:II.,204.]
[Footnote 3: Barante, vi.,50.]
[Footnote 4: Some of the canons wrote their reasons after their
recorded vote: "Because Duke Philip had made the candidate member
of his council of Holland, Zealand, and Friesland, in which office
Gijsbrecht had acquitted himself well." "Because all the Sticht nobles
were his relations," etc.--(Wagenaar, _Vaderlandsche Historie,_ iv.,
50.)]
[Footnote 5: Du Clercq, ii., 210.]
[Footnote 6: _Memoires_, i., ch. xxxiii.]
[Footnote 7: II., 315.]
[Footnote 8: See Lavisse, iv^{ii}., 317.]
[Footnote 9: For the effects of operations on a large scale see
_Jacques Coeur and Charles VII_., by Pierre Clemart.]
[Footnote 10: _Duclos_, "Hist. de Louis XI.," _OEuvres Completes_ v.,
8.]
[Footnote 11: Duclos, iii., 78.]
[Footnote 12: See Lavisse, iv^{ii}., 292.]
[Footnote 13: II.,223.]
[Footnote 14: _Lettres de Louis XI_., i., 77.
According to the editor, Vaesen, the original of this letter shows
that _September 2nd_ was written first and erased.]
[Footnote 15: Chastellain, iii., 185.]
[Footnote 16: Du Clercq, ii., 228.]
[Footnote 17: Chastellain iii., 197.]
[Footnote 18: See _Sejour de Louis XI. aux Pays-Bas;_ Reiffenberg:
Nouveaux mem. de l'Acad. Royale, 1829.]
[Footnote 19: Alienor de Poictiers, _Les Honneurs de la Cour_, ii.,
208. It was early in October.]
[Footnote 20: This date, November 11th, does not agree with the
others.]
[Footnote 21: "At that time they did not say Madame, for Monsieur was
not the son of a sovereign."--La Marche, ii., 410, note.]
[Footnote 22: La Marche, ii., 410: "Dieu quel parrain!"]
[Footnote 23: II., 343.]
[Footnote 24: Chastellain, iii., 185; Lavisse iv^{ii}., 299.]
CHAPTER V
THE COUNT AND THE DAUPHIN
1456-1461
The picture of the Burgundian court rejoicing in happy unison over the
advent of an heiress to carry on the Burgundian traditions, with the
dauphin participating in the family joy, shows the tranquil side of
the first months of the long visit. Before Mary's birth, however, an
incident had occurred, betraying the fact that the dauphin and Charles
VII. were not the only father and son between whom relations were
strained, and that a moment had arrived when the attitude of the Count
of Charolais t
|