FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97  
98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   >>   >|  
ve divisions (_classes_) were recognized whose property was assessed respectively at 100,000, 75,000, 50,000, 25,000 and 11,000 (or 12,500) asses. The first class contained 80 centuries; the second, third and fourth 20 each; the fifth 30. Added to these were the 18 centuries of knights (see EQUITES). The combined vote of the first class and the knights was thus represented by 98 centuries; that of the whole of the other _classes_ (including 4 or 5 centuries of professional corporations connected with the army, such as the _fabri_ and 1 century of _proletarii_, i.e. of all persons below the minimum census) was represented by 95 or 96 centuries. Thus the upper classes in the community possessed more than half the votes in the assembly. The newer scheme aimed at a greater equality of voting power; but it has been differently interpreted. The interpretation most usually accepted, which was first suggested by Pantagathus, a 17th-century scholar, is based on the view that the five _classes_ were distributed over the tribes in such a manner that there were 2 centuries of each class in a single tribe. As the number of the tribes was 35, the total number of centuries would be 350. To these we must add 18 centuries of knights, 4 of _fabri_, &c., and 1 of _proletarii_. Here the first class and the knights command but 88 votes out of a total of 373. Mommsen's interpretation (_Staatsrecht_, iii. p. 275) was different. He allowed the 70 votes for the 70 centuries of the first class, but thought that the 280 centuries of the other classes were so combined as to form only 100 votes. The total votes in the comitia would thus be 70 + 100 + 5 (_fabri_, &c.) + 18 (knights), i.e. 193, as in the earlier arrangement. In 88 B.C. a return was made to the original and more aristocratic system by a law passed by the consuls Sulla and Pompeius. At least this seems to be the meaning of Appian (_Bellum Civile_, i. 59) when he says [Greek: esegounto ... tas cheirotonias me kata phylas alla kata lochous ... gignesthai]. But this change was not permanent as the more liberal system prevails in the Ciceronian period. The _comitia tributa_ was in the later Republic the usual organ for laws passed by the whole people. Its presidents were the magistrates of the people, usually the consuls and praetors, and, for purposes of jurisdiction, the curule aediles. It elected these aediles and other lower magistrates of the people. Its jurisdiction was limited to
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97  
98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
centuries
 

knights

 

classes

 

people

 

passed

 
interpretation
 

proletarii

 

number

 

tribes

 

system


consuls

 

comitia

 

century

 

aediles

 
magistrates
 

combined

 

jurisdiction

 
represented
 
arrangement
 

earlier


praetors
 

original

 
limited
 

presidents

 

return

 

curule

 

Staatsrecht

 

Mommsen

 

elected

 

purposes


thought

 
aristocratic
 
allowed
 

prevails

 

liberal

 

command

 

Ciceronian

 

cheirotonias

 

esegounto

 

permanent


lochous

 

gignesthai

 

phylas

 

change

 
Pompeius
 

Republic

 

tributa

 
Civile
 
Bellum
 

Appian