FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410  
411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   >>   >|  
t not only of a fair but of a perfect pronunciation--not so much as the independent aim, but as an indispensable condition for the development of _Sprachgefuehl_. It is immeasurably easier to obtain good pronunciation from the start than to improve bad pronunciation by later efforts. In the teaching of pronunciation a slight difference in the treatment of children of twelve years and of college students might be granted: young children are generally able to learn the sounds of a foreign language by imitation; students of college age can hardly ever do this well, and careful phonetic instruction is absolutely necessary with them. Whoever wishes to keep aloof from phonetic _terms_ may do so; but not to know or not to apply phonetic _principles_ is bad teaching pure and simple. The use of phonetic _transcription_, however, is a moot question. Its advantages are obvious enough: it insures a clear consciousness of correct pronunciation; it takes up the difficulties one by one: first pronunciation, then spelling; it safeguards greater care in matters of pronunciation in general. The objections are chiefly two: economy of time, and the fear of confusion between the two ways of spelling. The writer admits that until a few years ago he was skeptical as to the value of phonetic transcription in the teaching of German. But the nearly general recognition of its value by the foremost educators of European countries and the good results achieved with it by teachers of French in this country caused him to give it a trial, under conditions that afforded not more than an average chance of success. The result was greatly beyond his expectations. Neither he nor, as far as he knows, any of his colleagues would contemplate abandoning phonetic script again. Without wishing to be dogmatic, I believe that this at least can be asserted with safety: on purely theoretical grounds, no teacher has a right to condemn phonetic transcription; those who doubt its value should try it before they judge. In the writer's opinion it is best not to use any historical spelling at all during the first six or eight weeks of college German. If the confusing features of traditional orthography are eliminated during this period, it will be found that there results not a loss, but an actual _gain in time_ from the use of phonetic script. Nor does the transition to common spelling cause any confusion. The less ado made about it, the better. It is a fact of experie
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410  
411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
phonetic
 

pronunciation

 
spelling
 

college

 
teaching
 

transcription

 

writer

 
German
 

results

 

confusion


students
 

general

 

script

 

children

 

dogmatic

 
wishing
 

Without

 
abandoning
 
caused
 

theoretical


grounds

 

purely

 

asserted

 

safety

 

country

 

contemplate

 

success

 

result

 

greatly

 

chance


average
 

conditions

 

afforded

 
teacher
 

perfect

 

colleagues

 

expectations

 

Neither

 
condemn
 
actual

orthography

 

eliminated

 
period
 

transition

 

experie

 

common

 

traditional

 

features

 

French

 

opinion